The Power of the Pause

The Power of the Pause

The most powerful skill I’ve learned over the years isn’t how to argue well or even how to solve problems quickly. It’s learning when to pause.

Every workplace, every relationship, and every leadership role eventually presents the same moment: someone becomes overwhelmed, emotions surge, and suddenly a small issue becomes a crisis.

At first it can feel confusing. You try to reason through the situation. You explain the facts. You attempt to calm the person down.

Eventually, though, something becomes clear.

The problem is often not the problem.

What you are actually witnessing is emotional dysregulation.

Emotional dysregulation occurs when someone becomes so overwhelmed by their feelings that their ability to process information rationally begins to shut down. The brain shifts into a stress response. Logic moves to the background while the nervous system takes over.

When that happens, the conversation stops being about facts and becomes about emotional survival.

Certain patterns begin to appear.

The tone escalates quickly.
Small situations become catastrophes.
Blame is directed outward.
Clarification is interpreted as criticism.
Facts are rejected because they do not align with the emotional narrative.

In those moments, the person is not really looking for a solution.

They are looking for relief from the emotional discomfort they are experiencing.

And very often they begin searching—consciously or unconsciously—for someone else to regulate those emotions for them.

Modern workplace research suggests these patterns are more common than many people realize. Surveys conducted by the American Psychological Association have found that nearly 60 percent of employees report experiencing significant stress at work, and many say they feel unprepared to navigate difficult interpersonal conflict.

Stress alone does not cause emotional dysregulation, but it often exposes the coping skills—or lack of coping skills—that people bring into challenging situations.


Seeing the Pattern

My understanding of this didn’t come only from textbooks.

I have a bachelor’s degree in psychology, and earlier in my career I worked in the mental health field with girls who had been removed from their homes and placed in DFS custody.

Those environments were anything but theoretical.

They were intense, emotionally charged, and sometimes dangerous. Situations unfolded in real time, often without warning.

Working with teenage girls already means navigating a stage of life filled with rapid emotional development and hormonal shifts. Adolescence is a time when identity and emotional regulation are still forming.

Add family trauma, abuse, and dysfunction to that already complicated developmental stage, and it often becomes the perfect storm.

Many of the girls we worked with were trying to process years of instability while still learning the most basic tools of emotional regulation. Their reactions were often big, immediate, and deeply connected to experiences that had shaped them long before they arrived in our care.

Research on Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) helps explain why these patterns appear so frequently. According to the CDC, nearly two-thirds of adults report experiencing at least one significant adverse childhood experience, such as abuse, neglect, or household dysfunction. Individuals with multiple ACEs are significantly more likely to struggle with stress regulation, emotional reactivity, and interpersonal conflict later in life.

Later, during my master’s program—where I completed 36 hours of graduate-level coursework in criminal psychology—the work centered on a fundamental question: what causes one person to act destructively while another, often facing similar circumstances, chooses a different path?

Much of the study focused on patterns—family trauma, environmental influences, and the subconscious motivations that shape outward behavior.

What people say on the surface is rarely the entire story.

Behavior is often the visible expression of something happening underneath.

Once you begin to see those emotional currents, it becomes difficult to stop noticing them.


The Rescue Trap

There is a psychological framework often called the Drama Triangle, which describes a dynamic that appears in many conflicts.

It consists of three roles: the Victim, the Persecutor, and the Rescuer.

Someone who feels overwhelmed casts themselves as the victim. Someone else—often the person delivering information, naming a truth, or setting a boundary—quickly becomes the persecutor.

And then a third role appears: the rescuer.

The person expected to smooth things over.
To soften the message.
To repair the emotional fallout.

What often goes unnoticed is that the rescuer is frequently the same person who set the boundary in the first place.

You say what needs to be said.

The other person reacts.

And suddenly you find yourself managing their reaction—backtracking, clarifying, softening, or trying to calm the emotional wave that followed.

At first this can feel compassionate.

It feels like you are helping.

But over time it becomes exhausting.

Because when you repeatedly rescue someone from their emotional responses to boundaries, you unintentionally prevent them from learning how to regulate those responses themselves.

And eventually you come to a difficult realization.

You can speak honestly.
You can set boundaries.
You can offer care.

But you cannot be responsible for stabilizing every emotion that those truths awaken in someone else.

At some point compassion stops meaning “fix it” and starts meaning “allow them to feel what they feel.”


When the Rescue Stops

At one point I found myself caught squarely in the rescue trap.

I had an employee who I also considered a friend. In many ways she was an excellent worker. She was helpful, willing to work hard, reliable, funny, and engaging.

But emotionally, she was constantly in crisis.

Every day there seemed to be some new cliff she needed to be talked down from. Situations that most people would see as minor inconveniences quickly became full-blown emergencies in her mind.

At first, I tried to help.

I listened.
I explained.
I reassured.

Without realizing it, I had slowly become her emotional landing pad—the place where every frustration, fear, and grievance was unloaded.

Eventually I asked something different of her.

Instead of immediately validating the emotional reaction, I asked her to look at the situation rationally.

That moment created a choice.

She could pause and reconsider.

Or she could double down.

She doubled down.

The messages grew longer. More emotional. The accusations more dramatic. The narrative drifted further away from the reality of the situation.

So I stopped responding.

As the younger generation might say, I simply left her on read.

Not out of cruelty, but because continuing the exchange would have meant stepping back into the rescuer role.

The messages became more indignant. More defensive. More irrational.

When others tried to calmly explain the situation, she insisted she was being attacked.

At that point the pattern became unmistakable.

Some people, when given the space to reflect, eventually step back and see the situation more clearly.

Others cannot.


When Boundaries Are Misread

At one point she said something that revealed the dynamic more clearly than anything else.

“I thought you were my friend.”

For a moment I considered responding.

Part of me wanted to say that friends don’t treat each other the way she was treating me.

But I also knew something else.

That response would not lead to clarity.

It would lead to defensiveness.

The conversation would become a battle over who was right rather than an opportunity for reflection.

And I don’t do that.

So I left it alone.

I know what friendship looks like.

It includes respect, accountability, and the ability to hear difficult truths without turning them into personal attacks.

Someone who is deeply caught in emotional dysregulation rarely has the ability to hear that message in the moment anyway.

Trying to force the realization would only create more conflict.

So instead I did the thing that had become the central lesson of the entire experience.

I paused.

And I left her with her own words.

Where I Learned It

Part of the reason I eventually learned the value of the pause is because I grew up in an environment where it didn’t exist.

In my family, conflict was immediate and intense. If something was wrong, it was addressed right away. Voices were raised. Emotions ran high. Harsh words were sometimes exchanged.

Eventually there would be resolution.

But usually only after the emotional storm had already passed.

Once everyone cooled down, apologies were often made and the situation would seem settled. At least until the next disagreement surfaced and the old argument found its way back into the conversation again.

Nothing was ever truly let go.

Psychologists sometimes refer to this pattern as grievance collecting or scorekeeping. Instead of conflicts being repaired and released, they remain stored away—ready to reappear during the next moment of tension.

Over time, this kind of environment can teach people that confrontation must always be intense in order to be honest.

But what makes this interesting is that I did not grow up learning emotional regulation.

I learned it later.

Psychologists studying resilience have found something hopeful: roughly one-third of people raised in high-conflict or unstable environments consciously develop healthier coping and communication patterns as adults.

In other words, people are not doomed to repeat the emotional patterns they grew up with.

Some people repeat them.

Others learn from them.

Over time I began to notice the patterns around me. I saw how quickly conflicts escalated when emotions took control and how much unnecessary damage those moments could cause.

So I began teaching myself something different.

To pause.


Emotional Regulation on the Field

Later in life, I saw another version of these lessons while coaching young girls in cheerleading.

Some of them joined because they imagined cheerleading as the world they saw from the outside—cute skirts, bright smiles, and the idea of being one of the popular girls. I understood that perspective. I had been a cheerleader myself in high school and made varsity my sophomore year.

But they learned quickly that a cheerleader is much more than the skirt she wears.

Cheerleading is a physical sport. Flyers and back spotters lift and support one another, and in many moments one athlete is literally placing her safety in the hands of another.

Before every stunt there has to be communication.

“Ready?”
“5, 6, 7, 8.”

That rhythm isn’t just about starting a routine.

It’s about synchronization.

Everyone has to move together. If one person is early or late, the stunt can collapse.

Because of that, the team had to learn emotional regulation just as much as physical coordination.

Conflicts happened—as they do with any group of young people. But the rule was simple: if something needed to be addressed, we handled it right there. It didn’t bleed into the next practice. It didn’t become hallway gossip or a topic of conversation weeks later.

We worked it out.
We repaired it.
And then we moved forward together.

I used to joke that my coaching style was somewhere between Mary Poppins and General Patton—firm expectations wrapped in encouragement.

Over time something beautiful happened.

The girls learned to communicate clearly, rotate leadership roles, and lift one another up—not just physically, but mentally and emotionally.

And I’ll admit, even now I get a little misty-eyed remembering those moments when they walked out onto the field ahead of me.

I didn’t lead them.

They led the way.

I walked behind them.

A leader sometimes needs to stay behind the flock, letting the most nimble move forward while quietly guiding the direction. From the outside it may look as if the group is simply moving together, not realizing that someone steady is helping hold the path.

Watching those girls step onto the field—confident, focused, and ready—was one of the greatest moments of my teaching life.

Because what they were really learning out there wasn’t just cheerleading.

They were learning trust.

Communication.

Leadership.

And the discipline of pausing long enough to move forward together.

Even years later I still receive messages from former students that simply say:

“Thank you, Coach Steph.”

Those notes remind me that emotional regulation is not just a psychological concept.

It is a life skill.


Skills That Used to Be Taught

Recently I walked into a fast-food restaurant and stepped up to the counter.

The young woman behind the register simply stared at me.

No greeting.
No “hello.”
No “welcome in.”
No “can I take your order.”

Just silence.

It struck me in that moment that we may be living in a different world.

People often joke that each generation is gradually losing manners, work ethic, and moral values. It’s easy to laugh about that idea, but the moment stayed with me because it reflected something deeper.

Many of the small skills that once helped people navigate daily interactions are simply no longer being taught.

How to greet someone.

How to make eye contact.

How to communicate clearly.

Even simple practical habits—like counting back change from a bill instead of just staring at the number on a register—are becoming less common.

It isn’t necessarily a lack of intelligence or ability.

More often, it’s a lack of training.

Work ethic, communication, emotional regulation—these are not traits people are born with. They are skills that used to be taught by families, schools, mentors, and early workplace experience.

When those lessons disappear, people enter adult environments without the tools needed to navigate stress, disagreement, or responsibility.

And when that happens, even small conflicts can escalate quickly.

Which makes something as simple as a pause even more important.

Because sometimes the difference between chaos and clarity isn’t intelligence or authority.

It’s whether someone in the room knows how to slow things down long enough for reason to return.


The Quiet Strength of Steadiness

Over time people begin to recognize steadiness.

When situations become tense—when emotions run high and something needs calm resolution—I often find that I am the person people turn to.

Not because I ask for that role.

But because calm is noticeable.

Organizations and teams tend to recognize people who can remain steady when others are overwhelmed. Those individuals are often entrusted with leadership not simply because of their technical ability, but because they bring stability into chaotic situations.

In my own work life, that steadiness has led to opportunities I am deeply proud of.

I was chosen to run the front of the house in my workplace—responsible not only for operations but for managing people, personalities, and pressure in real time.

I was also selected as a hole captain at a major PGA golf tournament, overseeing a team of seventeen people. Anyone who has worked around a major sporting event knows how quickly things can become stressful when the pace is fast and the expectations are high.

In those moments, what people need most is not someone who reacts.

They need someone who remains calm enough to think.

Leadership research increasingly confirms what experienced managers often observe: emotional regulation is one of the most important leadership skills a person can develop. Studies on emotional intelligence suggest that as many as 90 percent of top-performing leaders score high in emotional self-awareness and emotional regulation.

A steady presence slows the emotional momentum of a room.

It allows rational thinking to return.

Leadership is not about control.

It is about remaining grounded while others are overwhelmed.

And when people repeatedly trust you to hold that role, it becomes a quiet affirmation that the discipline of the pause matters.


The Lesson

Helping someone does not mean absorbing the full weight of their emotional reactions.

You can listen.

You can clarify.

You can offer solutions.

But emotional responsibility ultimately belongs to the person experiencing the reaction.

Sometimes people learn.

Sometimes they don’t.

And sometimes the most compassionate thing you can do is step back and allow the moment to unfold.

Because between reaction and response there is a small space.

And in that space lives something incredibly powerful.

Clarity.

Choice.

And the quiet strength of the pause.

Quick Pickled Vegetables

In the kitchen, I’ve learned that not everything needs to be fixed immediately.
Some things simply need a moment to settle.

Pickling is a lot like that.

The vegetables go in sharp and raw.
The brine is bright and intense.
But when you give it a little time, something changes. The edges soften. The flavors balance. What first felt harsh becomes something vibrant and alive.

Sometimes the best thing you can do is pause and let the moment transform itself.

Print
clock clock iconcutlery cutlery iconflag flag iconfolder folder iconinstagram instagram iconpinterest pinterest iconfacebook facebook iconprint print iconsquares squares iconheart heart iconheart solid heart solid icon

Quick Pickled Vegetables

5 Stars 4 Stars 3 Stars 2 Stars 1 Star No reviews
  • Author: Stephanie Bosch
  • Prep Time: 10 minutes
  • Cook Time: 5 minutes
  • Total Time: Pause / Pickling Time: 1 hour (or overnight for deeper flavor) Total Time: 1 hour 15 minutes
  • Yield: Servings: 6–8 servings

Description

The first taste is always the sharpest.

Give it a little time.

Just like people, vegetables settle once the moment has had space to breathe.

Quick pickled vegetables add brightness and crunch to:

  • grain bowls and Buddha bowls

  • sandwiches and wraps

  • tacos or rice bowls

  • avocado toast

  • charcuterie or snack boards

  • salads needing a little acidic lift

They also make a beautiful garnish for soups and noodle dishes.


Ingredients

Scale
  • 1 cup rice vinegar or apple cider vinegar
  • 1 cup water
  • 1 tablespoon sugar (optional but recommended for balance)
  • 1 teaspoon kosher salt
  • 12 cloves garlic, smashed
  • ½ teaspoon mustard seeds
  • ½ teaspoon black peppercorns

Vegetables (mix and match):

  • cucumbers, thinly sliced
  • carrots, shaved or cut into matchsticks
  • radishes, sliced
  • red onion, thinly sliced
  • bell peppers, thin strips
  • green beans


Instructions

  1. Pack the vegetables into a clean jar.

  2. In a small saucepan, combine the vinegar, water, sugar, salt, garlic, mustard seeds, and peppercorns. Bring just to a simmer until the salt and sugar dissolve.

  3. Pour the warm brine over the vegetables until fully covered.

  4. Let the jar sit on the counter for about 20–30 minutes to cool slightly, then place in the refrigerator.

  5. The vegetables will be lightly pickled in about one hour, but they become even better if you let them sit overnight.


Notes

• Thin slicing is key for quick pickles. The thinner the vegetable, the faster it absorbs the brine.
• These pickles keep well in the refrigerator for up to 2 weeks.
• Feel free to experiment with spices—dill seeds, coriander, chili flakes, or fresh herbs can add wonderful variation.
• The brine should taste slightly stronger than you expect; the vegetables will mellow the flavor as they absorb it.

Storage: Refrigerate up to 2 weeks

The Weight of Words –On Mercury, meaning, and the work of understanding.

The Weight of Words –On Mercury, meaning, and the work of understanding.

Let’s just say I’m looking forward to a few weeks off from work.

Even when you love what you do, stepping away for a bit can be good medicine. Life moves quickly, and sometimes the only way to hear your own thoughts again is to step out of the current for a moment. A little quiet. A little space. Time to reflect.

Interestingly enough, the timing lines up with Mercury being in retrograde. Most people think of Mercury retrograde as a nuisance—lost emails, delayed flights, technology acting strange—but for some of us it works more internally. It slows the mind down and asks you to look again. Old conversations resurface. Patterns become clearer. Things that didn’t quite make sense the first time around sometimes reveal themselves more clearly the second time around.

My relationship with Mercury has always been an interesting one.

My own chart leans heavily toward Scorpio: Sun, Venus, and Mercury all sitting there in the same deep water—what astrologers call a stellium, when several planets gather in the same sign and amplify its influence. Scorpio energy has never been particularly afraid of shadow. It tends to look directly at the things most people would rather avoid, especially when it comes to relationships, emotional truth, and the psychological currents moving underneath everyday life.

With the Sun there, identity itself tends to be shaped by transformation and depth. With Mercury there, the mind naturally notices what lies beneath the surface. And with Venus in Scorpio, relationships are rarely casual experiences—they ask for honesty, emotional intensity, and the kind of understanding that only comes from being willing to look at the deeper layers of connection.

And with Mercury there in particular—the planet that governs the mind, perception, and communication—the instinct is often to notice the subtext of things. Not just what is said, but tone, symbolism, placement, and what might be left unsaid. Scorpio Mercury has a way of reading the emotional and psychological undercurrents beneath the surface.

There is also a certain power in that placement. Mercury rules communication, and when it moves through Scorpio the words themselves tend to carry weight. They’re rarely casual. They come from somewhere deeper, shaped by reflection, emotion, and lived experience. Scorpio Mercurys often have the ability to take experience—especially the difficult or transformative kind—and put it into words in a way that resonates with others.

Which is probably why Mercury retrograde tends to feel less like chaos to me and more like clarity.

Retrogrades slow everything down just enough that you can look again. Sometimes what you see the second time around is the difference between the work itself and the way people respond to it.

When someone writes from lived experience—especially experience that involved pain, healing, and genuine inner work—the words carry more than their surface meaning. They are the residue of the process that produced them.

Anyone who has done real inner work knows what I mean.

It isn’t glamorous. It isn’t performative. Sometimes you bleed a little on the page. Sometimes you cry while writing. Sometimes you go to places inside yourself that you would have preferred to avoid but know you can’t if you want to come out whole.

When I finally wrote about that kind of experience, the symbols I used—fire, rebirth, the goddess—weren’t aesthetic choices. They were shorthand for transformation.

And this is where something interesting sometimes happens.

People encounter those symbols and respond to them. Sometimes beautifully. Sometimes creatively. That kind of response can actually be lovely. In fact, it can be deeply moving to see your words echo somewhere else—to realize that something you wrote meant enough to someone that it stirred something in their heart and mind.

But context matters.

Symbols that come from sacred or deeply personal work carry a certain gravity. When those same symbols are placed right alongside something impulsive, crude, or lacking in awareness, the contrast becomes revealing.

The sacred and the sensual are not mutually exclusive. In fact, throughout history they have often been intertwined. When held with knowledge, growth, and spiritual awareness, the union of the two can be profoundly transformative—something closer to the tantric understanding of embodiment, where physical experience and spiritual insight deepen one another rather than compete.

It was a somewhat crude awakening, but revealing to see the disparity of the two placed side by side—imagery drawn from transformation and reflection sitting next to something far more impulsive and instinctual in nature. Without restraint, discretion, or reflection, instinctual urges lose their depth and collapse into something careless. What could have been meaningful becomes empty, often leaving the people involved with the quiet feeling that something essential is missing.

And sometimes, with a little distance, you begin to notice something else as well. You start to see the difference between where you were coming from and where someone else might still be in their own process.

You notice patterns—not as judgment, but simply as observation. Different levels of reflection. Different stages of awareness.

And it can make you pause and wonder what exactly resonated with them in the first place.

Was it the meaning?

Or was it the glimpse of a kind of embodiment they may still be learning how to grow into themselves?

Because sometimes people are drawn to the energy of transformation before they are ready for the work that makes it real—the discipline, the reflection, the commitment that real change asks of us.

And that is part of the human journey too.

That realization used to make me angry. Lately, it simply makes me clear.

Because once you’ve done the work—once you’ve sat with the shadow long enough to understand it—no one else’s use of the language can actually cheapen what you experienced.

They can borrow the words.

They can echo the imagery.

They can place something sacred next to something crude and not even notice the difference.

But they cannot replicate the transformation that gave those symbols their meaning in the first place.

That work belongs to the person who lived it.

Finally, sometimes hearing another person’s truth can be difficult—not because it is meant as an attack, but because it touches something uncomfortable. In those moments, the reaction often says more about what the words revealed than about the words themselves.

You may still feel a little disappointed when you realize that not everyone is ready or willing to do that work for themselves. And if someone needs a little of your wisdom along the way, you can offer it. But that realization doesn’t have to require a response.

It doesn’t have to become a back-and-forth, and it certainly doesn’t have to turn into a competition over meaning.

You simply keep showing up and doing the work. Because this life is the path—the place where we learn, grow, and slowly awaken.

Social Media, Anxiety, and the Developing Nervous System

Social Media, Anxiety, and the Developing Nervous System

Two Realities, One Nervous System

If you’re parenting in this era, you’re parenting against something we were never trained for: an always-on world. A world where your child can be reached, influenced, evaluated, and emotionally impacted at any hour—without ever leaving their room. Social media changed childhood, and the nervous system is still catching up.

This post is about what constant online pressure does to kids, what happens when trauma gets stuck in the body, and why healing often isn’t about thinking your way through—it’s about learning how to feel safe again.

A few years ago, I went to hear Dr. Margaret Wehrenberg, PhD speak—aka “Aunt Peggy.” She’s a specialist in anxiety and depression, and she’s also my good friend Amy’s aunt. I remember thinking it would just be an informative night—one of those “let me learn something and go home” kind of talks.

But what she spoke about stayed with me: how social media and smartphones are impacting kids, not just socially, but psychologically—how it can amplify anxiety in a nervous system that’s still learning what safety even feels like.

Then she mentioned something I’ve never forgotten. She talked about Monitoring the Future, a long-term national measurement that’s been tracking adolescent outcomes since 1975, including things like dropout rates, teen pregnancy, substance use, and mental health trends like anxiety.
https://monitoringthefuture.org

And she said that for decades, the needle on anxiety barely moved.

Until around 2010.

That’s when it spiked—by something like 40%—right around the time social media became a normal part of daily life for kids.

I’ve also been reading The Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt, and it puts language and numbers to what so many parents have felt in their bones. He describes this shift as a “great rewiring” of childhood—from play-based to phone-based—and connects it to the sharp rise in youth anxiety and depression since 2010.

In that same window of time, rates of self-harm for young girls nearly tripled, and suicide rates for young adolescents increased by 167% from 2010 to 2021. (The Anxious Generation)

Haidt also points out something important: these effects aren’t always the same for everyone. In the book, he describes how social media tends to harm girls more through social comparison, perfectionism, and social pressure—fueling anxiety and depression—while boys are more likely to withdraw into virtual worlds, isolating themselves through gaming and online escapism. (The Anxious Generation)

And I need to say this part too, because it’s honest: I live with the regret that I gave my kids screens too soon.

I didn’t understand what we were dealing with. Most of us didn’t. We were told it was the future. We were told it was normal. We were told it was how the world worked now.

And when everyone around you is doing the same thing, it doesn’t feel like a decision with consequences… it just feels like parenting in the modern world.

But the truth is, we’re learning as we go.

And what’s wild is that even the people who helped build this world were cautious about it. Steve Jobs famously restricted his own children’s access to smartphones and tablets because he was worried about screen addiction, social skill development, and mental health.

That trend—tech leaders limiting their own kids’ exposure—wasn’t random. It reflected a desire to protect developing brains from addictive algorithms and constant stimulation.


When I Realized It Wasn’t Just “Teen Stuff”

Jason, my son, had a rough time online when he was thirteen. He got tangled up with people on the internet, and it turned into bullying.

What hit his nervous system wasn’t just what was happening online—it was what happened because of it.

The police showed up at our door.

It got serious enough that an adult called the police to check on him because they were worried he might hurt himself.

They were called out of concern, not punishment.

But when you’re a kid, your nervous system doesn’t understand nuance.

It only understands fear.

It only understands shame.

It only understands: something is happening and I’m not in control.

Looking back, I can see why it landed so hard. Because the online world kids live in now isn’t one our nervous systems were designed for—and sometimes it follows them into real life in the most terrifying ways.

And here’s the part I want to say out loud, because I know other parents might be carrying it too: I had no idea this was happening. I didn’t know  how quickly it could turn, or how deeply it could get into a developing nervous system.

I had parental controls set. I monitored what games he downloaded and what apps he could access. I was paying attention. But where there’s a will, there’s a way—and kids can always find loopholes we didn’t even know existed.

I thought I was doing what most parents do—making sure he was home, making sure he was okay, relying on parental controls on his device, trusting that “quiet” meant everything was fine.

And I missed it.


The World Our Nervous Systems Didn’t Evolve For 

Here’s another thing I can’t stop thinking about: it’s not normal for the human nervous system to have this much information, this much access, and this many people in our mental space who aren’t actually in our physical presence.

We were built for real-life proximity.

For tone.
For facial expression.
For context.
For repair.
For the natural limits of a day.
For the boundaries of a neighborhood.

But online, those limits disappear.

Now you can be exposed to hundreds of opinions, hundreds of interactions, and hundreds of little hits of rejection or approval without ever leaving your room. People can make fake accounts. They can move sideways. They can watch without being seen.

They can say things behind a screen they would never say face-to-face. And when you’re still developing, your nervous system can’t always tell the difference between a real threat and a social threat.

It just registers it as danger.

Psychologically, it creates dissonance.

Because you’re living in two realities at once: what’s happening in your actual life, and what’s being said about you in a digital one. And that split alone can overload the system.

Social media is also private in a way most adults didn’t grow up with. A lot of what happens there is invisible. And because it’s invisible, kids will hold things in.

And even with parental controls on their accounts, kids can still find surreptitious ways around them. Not because they’re bad, but because they’re curious, because they’re social, and because the internet is built to pull them in.

So even the best controls in the world can’t replace something more powerful:

real connection, real check-ins, and paying attention to subtle shifts.

If you notice your child acting differently—withdrawn, irritable, unusually quiet, suddenly emotional, not sleeping, not eating, snapping more than normal—ask.

Even if you asked yesterday.
Even if you asked this morning.
Ask again.

It’s not just my kids. This is showing up in kids everywhere, in ways we didn’t grow up with. It’s not just happening in our home—this is a real part of parenting now. And so many of us are learning in real time what constant online pressure does to a developing nervous system.

If you’re a parent reading this and nodding quietly, I see you.

It’s so important to stay on top of it, because the truth is… it’s easy to miss. I’m guilty of it too. They’re on their phone doing their thing, the house is quiet, everything looks fine, and quiet can feel like peace.

But sometimes quiet is just what’s happening on the surface.

Underneath, something can be building.


Boundaries Aren’t Punishment, They’re Protection

And while I’m talking about kids here, I also want to say this: I have felt my own anxiety around social media.

I got off Facebook, even though that’s where most of my family and close friends share content. Around election time, I got off entirely. I miss seeing my memories and checking in with folks every now and again—but I also know what it does to my nervous system when I stay on too long.

On my Chefsteph Instagram page, I removed 7,500 people and narrowed it down to people I actually know, or at the furthest, friends of friends. I go offline to rest and restore. I recently made my account private because boundaries are important to me.

And I’m done accepting fake accounts or people coming at me sideways. If someone can’t show up honestly, I’m not accepting them.

Not just for my sake—who is this person, really, and why are they showing up behind a fake account?—but as a matter of principle.

Because I want to practice what I preach and teach my kids that we don’t invite unclear energy into our lives just because it knocks.

I’ve also started thinking about boundaries differently—not as punishment, but as nervous-system protection. A simple rule like two hours of screen time per day can make room for something kids desperately need:

their own life.

Because when the phone goes down, something else has to come up.

  • Reading a book

  • Going to the library

  • Family time

  • Puzzles (this one is so underrated)

  • Chores

  • Cooking

  • Going outside

  • Moving their body

  • Sitting in the same room together without everyone disappearing into a screen

Some way to find connection aside from the phone.

And honestly… sometimes it’s just being bored.

Boredom leads to creativity.

And we are not bored enough anymore. We want to fill every empty moment. But the brain reads all those scrolls and swipes as dopamine hits—tiny rewards that keep us reaching for more.

Over time, it can start rewiring the brain’s pathways, making real life feel dull, making quiet feel uncomfortable, making a normal day feel like it’s missing something.

And that alone can feed anxiety and depression.

And I think about all of this a lot, because I didn’t just hear it in a lecture.

I’ve watched it show up in my own home.


When Trauma Gets Stuck in the Body

My wish is that the person who was worried would’ve contacted me first and let me handle it privately with my son. I understand why they did what they did. I don’t question the concern.

I just wish the first step had been a conversation—because once the police are involved, a kid’s nervous system doesn’t file it under “help.” It files it under fear.

Here’s the part that breaks my heart as his mom:

Five years later… he’s still processing it. Afraid that any little thing he does is going to get him in trouble with the law.

He’s still running the loop.

And he’s not doing it because he’s dramatic. He’s doing it because his nervous system never finished that moment. So he keeps circling it from every angle, trying to settle it with reassurance.

He’s tried to find answers from people who feel like safety—police officers, attorneys, his parents, his therapist, his friends.

And it works… for a while.

Because talking through it can calm the mind. It can bring logic back online. It can make the story feel organized. It can give you the sense that you’re back in control.

But reassurance has a short shelf life when the pain is still lodged in the body.

Eventually, it rises again.

And that’s how you know the trauma isn’t resolved.

It’s just being managed.


Trauma Doesn’t Stay in One Place

This is what trauma does as you grow older when it isn’t fully processed:

It generalizes.

It stops being “that one thing that happened” and starts becoming the lens you see life through.

It can show up as:

  • Anxiety that doesn’t make sense on paper

  • Hypervigilance

  • Irritability

  • Shutdown

  • Trouble trusting people

  • Fear of being in trouble, even when you’ve done nothing wrong

  • The feeling that you have to prove you’re good

  • The constant question underneath everything: am I safe now?

And when you can’t get the feeling of safety to stick, you start reaching for substitutes.

Sometimes we don’t run to what’s healthy. We run to what’s familiar.

And familiar can feel like safety—not because it actually is, but because your body already knows the pattern.

Your nervous system hears “familiar” and thinks:

I know this terrain.
I know the rules here.
I’ve survived this before.

Even if it’s messy.
Even if it isn’t good for you.
Even if it keeps you stuck.

So familiar people can become a kind of nervous-system medication. They soothe you. They calm you down. They make the panic soften for a minute.

But they can also keep the loop running because they offer temporary relief without requiring the deeper thing:

feeling it all the way through.


The Hardest Part to Explain

The hardest part to explain is that it isn’t something you can think your way through.

You can understand the story intellectually and still have your body respond like you’re back in it.

Healing often means going back—not to relive it, but to finally process what never got processed in real time. It can be uncomfortable and it can be scary, but in the right setting, with the right people, it can be deeply therapeutic.

Because when those feelings finally move through, the nervous system gets the message it missed the first time:

you’re safe now.


Trauma Is Like a Splinter

I tried to explain it to my son like this:

Trauma is like getting a splinter.

At first, it hurts and you know it’s there. But digging it out hurts more, so you avoid it. You leave it alone. And eventually, it calluses over.

Sometimes the pain goes numb. Or you get used to it. It becomes part of your normal, and you stop questioning it.

You start to think: this is just who I am now. This is just how life feels.

But the truth is, it never fully heals if the splinter is still inside.

Healing means digging through the layers, feeling what you didn’t get to feel back then, and finally getting it out.

Because until it comes out, it will keep finding ways to hurt.


You Have to Feel It Through

Until he can go back to that day—not just in memory, but emotionally—and actually feel what his thirteen-year-old self felt…

he’ll keep circling it.

He’ll keep looking for safety in other people’s words.
He’ll keep trying to talk it away.
He’ll keep trying to logic his way out of something his body is still holding.

And I say this with so much love:

You can’t think your way into feeling safe. You have to feel your way there.


Why This Matters Right Now

Jason leaves for the Navy soon, and it matters to me more than I can even explain that he makes peace with this before he sails off.

Not because I think he’s broken.
Not because he can’t handle hard things.

But because I want him to have a fresh start.

I want him to go into the world with a nervous system that knows how to come back to center. I want him to see the world through the eyes of safety and emotional regulation—not through the lens of “I’m in trouble,” “I’m not safe,” or “I’m about to get blindsided.”

The Navy is structure. It’s pressure. It’s new environments and new people and new intensity.

And I want him to meet all of that from a place inside himself that feels steady.

Not braced.
Not waiting for the next hit.
Just grounded.

Because when you make peace with what happened, you stop living inside it.

And you finally get to live from who you are now.


What I’m Doing Next: Somatic Therapy

This is why I’m working to find him a therapist who works with somatic release—somatic therapy.

Because I don’t think he needs more people helping him figure it out.

I think he needs help letting his body finally release what it’s been holding for five years.

Somatic therapy is different from only talking through the story.

A somatic therapist will still listen, of course—but the focus is on what’s happening inside your body while you’re talking.

Where do you feel it?
What changes when you bring it up?
Does your chest tighten? Does your stomach drop? Does your jaw clench?

Because trauma isn’t just a memory.

It’s survival energy that got stuck in place.

And the goal isn’t to relive it. The goal is to help the nervous system complete what it never got to complete—so the body can finally understand:

that was then.
this is now.
you’re safe.

Somatic work can look like noticing sensations, grounding, breathing, learning how to stay present in small pieces, and letting the body discharge what it couldn’t release back then—shaking, tears, deep exhales, warmth moving through the chest… all the things we’ve been taught to suppress.

Not dramatic.
Not forced.
Just real.

Because that loop of anxiety and reassurance-seeking isn’t weakness.

It’s a body that still believes it’s in danger.

And you don’t talk a body into safety.

You teach it.


Another Tool That Can Help: Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT)

His therapist diagnosed him with PTSD, and that diagnosis actually helped me make sense of the “loop” he’s been stuck in. Because PTSD doesn’t always look like what people think it looks like.

Sometimes it looks like overthinking.

Replaying.

Reassurance-seeking.

Hypervigilance.

Avoidance.

Shutting down.

Trying to control the outcome before anything bad can happen again.

One evidence-based therapy that’s often used to treat PTSD is Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT). CPT is a structured, 12-session form of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) designed specifically to help people process trauma by identifying and challenging the beliefs that formed in the aftermath of it.

In other words: CPT helps you find the “stuck points.”

Those beliefs that get written into the nervous system like truth:

I’m not safe.
I can’t trust people.
If I’m not in control, something bad will happen.
Something is wrong with me.
I don’t deserve peace.
I’m going to get blindsided again.

CPT helps people notice those beliefs, challenge them, and replace them with something truer and more stable. It’s not about pretending the trauma didn’t happen. It’s about updating the brain and body so they stop living like it’s still happening.

CPT also works through five core themes that trauma often damages:

Safety
Trust
Control
Esteem
Intimacy

And when you think about it, those five themes are exactly what gets distorted when a kid is scared, overwhelmed, and powerless in a moment they don’t understand.

This is why I’m taking his healing seriously now, before he leaves for the Navy.

Because I want him to walk into adulthood without carrying that day like a shadow behind him. I want him to be able to trust himself. Trust his instincts. Regulate his emotions. And live from a place that feels safe in his body.

Not just for his future.

For his peace.


If You Want a Place to Start

And if you’re reading this and you recognize your own child in any of these patterns, I want you to know you’re not alone. There are real, evidence-based ways to manage anxiety and trauma, and it’s never, ever too late to start healing.

If you want resources you can hold in your hands, I recommend three that are highly rated, easy to understand, and truly effective:

The Feeling Good Handbook by David Burns
https://books.google.com/books?q=The+Feeling+Good+Handbook+David+Burns

The Anxiety and Phobia Workbook by Edmund Bourne
https://books.google.com/books?q=The+Anxiety+and+Phobia+Workbook+Edmund+Bourne

The PTSD Workbook by Mary Beth Williams and Soili Poijula
https://books.google.com/books?q=The+PTSD+Workbook+Mary+Beth+Williams+Soili+Poijula

Reaching out isn’t invasive—it’s love.

I tell my kids all the time: I’m doing this because I care. If I didn’t care, I wouldn’t worry, I wouldn’t ask, I wouldn’t try to help.

And if you’re a parent doing the same, I see you.

Keep going.

The Woman Who Could Do it All

The Woman Who Could Do it All

Hyper-Independence, Attachment, and the Gendered Shape of Survival

Show and Tell

When I was in kindergarten, during the first week of school,  we were asked to bring something from home that told the class something about us.

My parents had just split, and we were living with my grandparents. It was disorienting. Nothing felt settled. I remember standing alone in the back bedroom, looking at my things, trying to decide what could speak for me. The room felt temporary, like none of it quite belonged to me. I picked things up and put them back down. Nothing felt right. Nothing felt like enough.

I wanted to bring something that mattered.

So I brought a trophy.

I don’t remember choosing it so much as holding it. It was heavy in my tiny hands. Solid. It felt like something that could justify my place in the room. It was my grandmother’s bowling trophy. Her name was engraved on the bottom: Wanda Thornton.

At school, I stood at the front of the room.

The kids sat on the floor in front of me, gathered close together. Mrs. Welcher, my kindergarten teacher, sat behind them, perched on a desk, watching. I remember the weight of the trophy in my small hands. I remember passing it forward, letting it move from hand to hand. I don’t remember what I said while I was talking. I only remember that she let me tell my story.

The kids passed it carefully from one to another. When it made its way back to her, she turned it over.

Most of the kids didn’t know how to read yet.
But she did.

She looked at the name and asked, gently, who Wanda Thornton was.

My chest tightened.
My face flushed.

I knew then that the proof I had brought could fall apart. That if the other kids realized the trophy wasn’t mine, it would be confirmation—public and unmistakable—that I had nothing of my own to show. That who I was might not be enough on its own.

“That’s my real name,” I said.

It was the first lie I remember telling.

Not to deceive.
Not to impress.
But to protect what little ground I felt I had.

Mrs. Welcher didn’t expose me.

She didn’t embarrass me.

She didn’t take the story away.

She simply looked at me with the saddest eyes I have ever seen.

When I saw her eyes, I knew she knew.

And I knew something else, too: she was holding my secret.

She didn’t correct me.
She didn’t turn the truth outward.
She didn’t let the room see what she saw.

She held it.

She held the weight of what she knew and kept me intact.

She didn’t just see a child with a trophy that wasn’t hers.
She saw a child who couldn’t yet see herself.

She didn’t give me words.
She gave me time.

That was the first time I learned what trust felt like—not as instruction, but as experience. Being seen without being exposed. Known without being harmed.

Little Girl Lost

That moment did not happen in isolation.

Living with my grandparents became intolerable for my mother.
So she left.

She took my brother with her.
And I stayed.

I don’t remember that as a decision so much as a fact—something that happened before I had language for preference or protest.

My grandparents were loving to me.
I felt safe there. I felt like I had a place.

That house had a rhythm I could trust. In the kitchen, I was given small, real tasks—ways to belong without having to perform. I learned to cook there, standing beside my grandmother, being handed responsibility that felt steady instead of heavy. I helped her set the table. I was the one who got to tell my grandpa when dinner was ready.

Those moments mattered.

They weren’t about achievement or usefulness as survival. They were about participation. About being included. About knowing I had a role because I was wanted, not because I was needed to hold things together.

That sense of safety—the feeling of being anchored, of having a place—was real. And it is why losing it landed the way it did.

Later, when I was in third grade, my mother moved my soon-to-be stepfather into the house she was living in. She married not for love, but for safety—for stability, for protection she did not feel she had on her own.

And then they came for me.

There was no we’re coming for you this weekend.
No what are your thoughts.
No warning at all.

It was get your things.
Let’s go.
Now.

The decision had already been made.

I understand now that my mother knew it wouldn’t be easy. That it wouldn’t happen without resistance. I’m sure she prepared him for that—not because she wanted a fight, but because she expected one.

Because something in my grandparents would not move quietly.

That knowledge didn’t make what followed cruel.
But it did make it final.

There was no space for hesitation. No room for orientation. No time to gather myself emotionally before being asked to leave what felt like the last place I understood.

The Night the Ground Shifted

My grandfather stepped in.

What followed was not a conversation.
It became a confrontation.

I remember the escalation more than the details—the sense that the ground I was standing on was no longer solid, that the adults in the room were deciding something about my life while my body was still trying to understand what was happening. What had felt like safety only moments before was suddenly unavailable.

I was traumatized deeply.

Not because anyone intended to harm me, but because something essential was taken without consent: continuity. Choice. The sense that comfort could be trusted to remain.

When we arrived back home that night, I was spanked.

Not out of cruelty.
Not out of hatred.
But because my resistance and my crying were seen as defiance.

There was overwhelm in the room. Authority needed to be restored. And at the time, there was a belief—widely held—that compliance was the way forward, that a child’s distress was something to be corrected rather than understood.

Still, it landed.

What I learned in that moment was not about punishment.
It was about power.

That saying no did not stop what was coming.
That my body’s protest did not change the outcome.
And that I had only myself to rely on.

That adapting was safer than resisting.

It would not be the last time I was pulled from what felt secure, only to be asked—implicitly—to find my way again.

Those two and a half years at my grandparents’ house would be the longest I lived anywhere as a child.
I wouldn’t stay in one place that long again until my junior year of college.

I didn’t notice the symmetry at the time. I only know now that my nervous system learned something early about impermanence. That staying was rare. That settling was temporary. That belonging had an expiration date.

So when it ended, I learned to move.

Learning to Survive

After few months my mother married him, the pattern didn’t disappear. It reorganized.

My mother sank into a deep depression.
She rarely left her room.

And when she wasn’t depressed, she was either oblivious or enraged—present in body, but unpredictable in tone. The house could feel absent one moment and volatile the next. There was no steady middle ground to rest in.

There was no announcement, no explicit handoff of responsibility. Life simply needed to keep moving, and someone had to tend to it.

That was when I cleaned the house in between doing homework.
That was when I cooked dinner between assignments.
That was when I did laundry—because if I didn’t, there were no clean clothes, no towels.

That was when I learned to read the room, smooth tension, and take responsibility early.

This is also when hyper-independence begins to settle into a child—most often between the ages of six and ten. Old enough to notice emotional shifts. Old enough to intervene. Too young to leave.

The nervous system learns a quiet rule:
If I stay alert, things go better.
If I manage myself, I reduce risk.
If I don’t need too much, I can stay.

This was not responsibility as contribution.
It was responsibility as regulation.

No one asked me to do this.
And no one meant for it to cost what it did.

But it shaped me all the same.

When consistent emotional containment is absent, the child becomes the container.

Clinical Definition of Hyper-Independence

Hyper-independence is a trauma-adapted coping pattern characterized by an excessive reliance on oneself and a persistent avoidance of depending on others, even when support is available, appropriate, or needed.

Clinically, it is understood not as a personality trait, but as a protective strategy that develops in response to early environments where:

  • caregivers were emotionally unavailable, inconsistent, overwhelmed, or unpredictable

  • expressing needs led to rejection, punishment, instability, or role reversal (this was a big one for me, I was often more the parent)

  • reliance increased risk rather than safety

In these conditions, the nervous system learns that self-containment is safer than connection.


Core Features (Clinical Markers)

Hyper-independence often includes:

  • Chronic difficulty asking for help (i.e., control freak)

  • Guilt or anxiety around having needs

  • Over-functioning in relationships (doing, managing, fixing)

  • Emotional self-sufficiency that masks unmet attachment needs

  • Discomfort receiving care or rest

  • Preference for control over mutual reliance

  • High competence paired with internal exhaustion

Importantly, these behaviors are adaptive, not pathological. They once increased survival and emotional stability.

Hyper-Independence in Adulthood

In adult intimate relationships, this pattern didn’t disappear. It translated.

I found myself aligned with people whose inner world was unstable, inconsistent, or difficult to access—not because chaos was desired, but because the structure was familiar.

These relationships organized themselves around imbalance. One person struggled to remain present or regulated. The other became the steady one—anticipating shifts, managing emotional weather, absorbing volatility.

Care became the structure of the relationship.

Intensity replaced consistency.
Need replaced reciprocity.
Apology replaced repair.

Fixing felt like closeness.
Endurance felt like love.

It took many years to see this clearly. Years of explaining away my own hunger. Years of feeling tired but loyal. Years of mistaking steadiness for intimacy and exhaustion for devotion.

Breadcrumbs felt tolerable because they didn’t require rest.
They didn’t require trust.
They didn’t require relinquishing control.

Breadcrumbs belong in recipes.

Guilt, Boundaries, and Returning Responsibility

One of the quiet costs of hyper-independence is guilt around having needs at all.

Saying no can feel dangerous.
Expressing desire can feel selfish.
Setting a boundary can feel like betrayal.

Especially when you’ve learned that speaking up causes other people to fall apart, blow up, or collapse into victimhood.

So instead of expressing ourselves, we manage.
We regulate.
We absorb.

We keep the system steady because confrontation feels like too much. Because we know how costly it can be.

But here is the truth that took me years to live into:

Managing someone else’s emotions does not help them.
It prevents them from ever having to take responsibility for their own inner world.

When we stop managing other people’s emotions, one of two things happens to them. Some people recognize the pattern and grow.

Most do not. They find blame. Or collapse. Or make themselves the victim—which reactivates guilt.

That doesn’t mean the boundary was wrong.

It means the relationship was built on you carrying what they would not.

It took me years to say this to my mother. And when I finally did, I said it gently and clearly:

I love you. I can’t do this anymore.
I don’t owe you this role.
You owe it to yourself to notice this pattern.

That was not abandonment.
It was honesty.

We are not an endless cup.
We are not responsible for regulating other people’s emotional lives.

Boundaries are not punishments.
They are information.

They return responsibility to where it belongs.

Recovery and Reorientation

Healing hyper-independence doesn’t mean becoming dependent or losing your strength.

It looks quieter than that.

It looks like pausing before fixing.
Speaking directly instead of managing silently.
Letting others feel their own discomfort without absorbing it. (Not easy, but vital)

In healthy relationships, care moves in both directions.
Responsibility is shared.
Rest is built into the bond.

Consistency replaces intensity.
Presence replaces endurance.

You don’t have to be the strongest one in the room to be loved.

What a Healthy Relationship Feels Like

1. Needs can be named without guilt

You can say:

  • “I need help.”

  • “That didn’t work for me.”

  • “I need some time.”

…and the relationship does not destabilize.

No one collapses.
No one explodes.
No one makes you responsible for managing their reaction.

Your needs are information, not threats.


2. Responsibility is shared, not absorbed

Both people notice what needs attention.

You are not:

  • tracking emotional temperature alone

  • fixing tension before it’s named

  • carrying the relational load by default

Care moves in both directions, naturally and without scorekeeping.


3. Boundaries create closeness instead of distance

In a healthy relationship, boundaries don’t end connection—they shape it.

A “no” doesn’t require justification.
A limit doesn’t trigger punishment or withdrawal.
Repair follows disagreement instead of avoidance.

Boundaries make trust possible because they make safety predictable.


4. Presence replaces intensity

Connection doesn’t rely on highs and lows to feel real.

There is:

  • consistency instead of urgency

  • follow-through instead of promises

  • calm that feels trustworthy, not boring

You don’t have to earn closeness through effort or endurance.


5. You don’t have to be anything but you to belong

You can show up tired, unsure, or incomplete.

You don’t need to:

  • be impressive

  • be useful

  • be “the strong one”

Love is not contingent on what you provide.


6. Repair is possible and expected

Missteps happen. They’re addressed.

The relationship includes:

  • acknowledgment without defensiveness

  • accountability without shame

  • change over time, not just apology

You don’t have to manage the repair alone.


7. Rest is allowed

This is a quiet but crucial sign.

You can relax in the relationship without scanning for what’s about to go wrong. Your nervous system isn’t on constant alert.

You don’t feel responsible for holding everything together.

Right Correction

This year, something shifted.

Once a truth is fully seen, remaining the same becomes unbearable.

My resolution is not aspirational.
It is corrective.

I no longer have to borrow proof to justify my place in the room.

For a long time, standing meant performing.
It meant reading the space and deciding what version of myself would be safest there.
It meant arriving prepared—with competence, with usefulness, with something to offer—so I could stay.

That was never vanity.
It was survival.

When worth once felt conditional, proof became protection.
Achievement became permission.
Strength became a way to belong without needing.

But I don’t live there anymore.

I know who I am now.

What I Will Do Going Forward

Going forward, I will notice when I step in too quickly.

When I feel the familiar pull to manage, to smooth, to fix, I will pause. I will ask myself whether what I’m about to do is care—or control born from old vigilance.

I will practice asking directly for what I need instead of proving I don’t need anything at all.

I will let discomfort exist—mine and other people’s—without rushing to resolve it. I will trust that adults can carry their own emotions, even when it’s hard, even when it’s messy.

I will say no without apology and without over-explaining.
I will allow disappointment to inform my choices instead of something I silently endure.

In relationships, I will choose reciprocity over familiarity. I will notice whether care flows in both directions, whether responsibility is shared, whether presence is consistent rather than intense.

I will stop confusing endurance with love.

At work and in leadership, I will delegate instead of absorbing.

I will be clear instead of accommodating.

I will trust people with responsibility rather than protecting them from it—and trust myself enough to step back.

With my children, I will model something different.

I will invite their voices.
I will let them have needs.
I will show them that asking for help is not failure, and that rest does not have to be earned.

And when old patterns surface—as they sometimes will—I will meet them with curiosity instead of judgment. I will remember that hyper-independence kept me safe once. I will thank it—and I will not let it drive anymore.

I am not here to survive my life.
I am here to live it.

And from here forward, I choose connection that does not require self-erasure, love that includes rest, and a way of being that no longer asks me to stand alone to belong.

And because I know that, the child who once stood in the back bedroom—turning objects over in her hands, wondering what might finally make her matter—no longer has to solve that question alone.

She doesn’t have to earn space.
She doesn’t have to justify herself.
She doesn’t have to manage the room to remain inside it.

She is loved.
She is enough.
And she gets to stand exactly as she is.

Not alert.
Not braced.
Not performing.

Just here.

And that is where the pattern ends.

Your Needs Matter

This is how the pattern begins.

When a child does not get to decide—
when choices are made for their body, for their belonging, for their sense of safety—
they learn that needs are negotiable.
That stability comes from compliance.
That staying requires adaptation.

When expressing themselves leads to upheaval—
to someone falling apart, erupting, or withdrawing—
they learn to manage instead of ask.
To contain instead of feel.
To hold the system together rather than risk becoming a problem within it.

So they become capable.
They become steady.
They become the one who can be counted on.

And over time, that strategy hardens into identity.

Hyper-independence is not born from confidence.
It is born from necessity.

It looks like doing everything yourself.
Like anticipating needs before they’re spoken.
Like managing emotional weather quietly.
Like feeling guilty for wanting more.
Like saying yes while your body is saying no.

It looks like love that exhausts you.
Like relationships where you carry the weight and others never have to.
Like being praised for strength while starving for rest.

And here is how the pattern breaks.

Not through confrontation.
Not through blame.
But through recognition.

The moment someone realizes:
My needs are real.
My voice matters.
I am not responsible for managing other people’s emotional lives.

When the work stops being absorbed, responsibility returns to where it belongs.

Some people rise to meet it.

Most do not. (My mother took it as a personal affront)

I had to lower my emotional expectations from her.

I had to grieve this:

My mother is not the person I can:

  • process feelings with

  • seek comfort from

  • expect emotional safety from

That doesn’t mean no relationship.
It means knowing the limits (mine and hers)

That does not make the boundary wrong.

Boundaries are not punishments.
They are information.

They say: this is where I end, and you begin.
They create the possibility of mutuality instead of management.
Of love that includes reciprocity.

By doing this I also expect guilt from my mother, but I no longer negotiate with it. (The crazy thing is she has a Master’s in Psychology, talk about not seeing the forest for the trees…)

When her behavior is pointed out, her escalation is often followed by:

  • tears

  • self-blame

  • “I guess I’m just a terrible mother”

  • “You don’t care about me”

These are regulation bids, not emergencies.

I now respond with:

  • “I’m not saying that.” (Please don’t twist my words to suit your narrative, it’s manipulative.)

  • “I love you and I’m still holding this boundary.”

  • “We can talk when things are calmer.” This is a big one.

So this is what anyone living this pattern deserves to hear now:

You matter.
Your needs matter.
You were never meant to earn belonging by holding everything together.

You are allowed to stop managing.
You are allowed to ask.
You are allowed to rest without apology.

And when this recognition is lived—not just understood—something changes forward as well as backward.

Children raised by someone who knows this get to have needs.
They get to have voices.
They don’t have to manage the room to belong in it.

And because of that, something different is passed on.

Not survival.
But safety.

Not endurance.
But choice.

Not silence.
But love that meets people where they are.

You are not too much.
You never were.

You were carrying too much.

And now—
you don’t have to anymore.

The Men, the Myth, and the Making of Wholeness

The Men, the Myth, and the Making of Wholeness

 The Masculine Line: From Survival to Presence

For most of my life, I understood my lineage through the vioce of the feminine.
The mothers.
The grandmothers.

The endurance required to survive inside marriages and social structures that often provided stability—financially, socially, materially—but not always emotional or spiritual reciprocity.

This is not an indictment of the men.

The men in my life were, without exception, good to me. Kind. Present in the ways they knew how to be. What I came to understand later is that being good to a child and being emotionally or spiritually available within an adult partnership are not the same thing.

Me and my Grandpa (My little shopping basket)

The women who married these men—or were shaped by them as daughters—lived a different reality, one shaped by roles, expectations, and unspoken limits that did not apply to me in the same way.

I find it important to note, before I go any further, that much of what I learned about these men came through the women who survived alongside them. Their stories were rarely neutral. The men were remembered as either idealized or vilified—heroes or tyrants, saviors or failures. At the time, I accepted those accounts as truth.

What I see now is that these stories were filtered through pain. Through grief. Through unmet needs and unspoken wounds. The women were not lying—they were translating experience through the only language they had. What they shared reflected their own trauma, their own losses, their own understanding at the time.

Holding this awareness has changed how I listen. I am no longer trying to decide who was right or wrong. I am learning to see the whole system—how survival shaped memory, how pain simplified people, and how complexity was flattened in the telling.

This, too, is part of the inheritance.
Not just what happened, but how it was remembered.

But the re-wilding work I did this summer made something unmistakably clear:

I was not born of woman alone.
I was born of woman and man.

Which means the masculine line lives in me too—not symbolically or theoretically, but physically. In my nervous system. In my instincts. In the ways I protect, endure, withdraw, and stay alert.

When I turned toward that line—not outside myself, but within—the story that emerged was heavy and exact.

The masculine lineage I come from is shaped by fear, control, abandonment, and silence.

Those wounds did not express itself in a single way.
In my family, it split.

I want to name the limits of this inquiry. I only traced the lineage as far back as my great-grandparents, not because the story ends there, but because that is where I still had narrative—where lives were remembered, shaped, and held in story rather than abstraction. It was far enough back to see the pattern clearly. Anything beyond that would have required speculation rather than listening.

The Men (My Father’s Side)

The Origin: My Great-Grandfather

 

Forest Dale (Standing, second from the left. Couple sitting were my great-great grandparents)

 

At the root of this lineage is an incident that clarifies everything that followed. My great-grandfather once nearly beat one of his own children to death. The violence did not stop on its own. It was interrupted only because his oldest son intervened and physically stopped him.

From a psychological perspective, this was not simply an episode of abuse—it was a foundational trauma. For the children who witnessed it, authority became synonymous with danger. Rage became lethal. Attachment and threat occupied the same space. Safety was no longer something provided by a caregiver; it became something that had to be negotiated, managed, or forcibly imposed by others.

This kind of event fractures a family system at the level of the nervous system. It teaches children that power is unpredictable, that emotion escalates without warning, and that survival may depend on either disappearance or control. It also establishes a pattern in which violence is both feared and unconsciously replicated—not because it is desired, but because it becomes the only available language for expressing overwhelm.

What followed in the generations after was not cruelty evolving, but containment strategies multiplying. Some men learned to dominate. Others learned to go silent. Some sought rigid external structures. Others fled. All of these responses trace back to the same moment: a system overwhelmed beyond its capacity to regulate.

This is where the masculine line I carry began to organize itself around fear.


Structure Replaces Tenderness: My Grandfather

My grandfather’s devotion to conformity and military structure was not simply belief—it was adaptation. He grew up in the shadow of a father whose authority was enforced through physical violence, and his nervous system learned early that chaos was dangerous and power was how one survived. In that world, softness invited harm, and unpredictability carried threat.

The military offered him something his childhood never did: rules instead of rage, hierarchy instead of fear, punishment with logic rather than violence without reason. Structure became his refuge.

As a father, he did not know how to meet resistance with curiosity or attunement; rebellion registered as danger. When my own father pushed back—seeking identity and autonomy—my grandfather responded not with fists, but with systems, believing that imposed order could correct what he could not emotionally reach. Institutionalization became a stand-in for repair.

In the 1960s, it was still possible to institutionalize someone simply for being difficult, defiant, or inconvenient. A teenager who challenged authority, refused to comply, and could not be managed within a rigid family structure could be labeled disordered and removed. What was framed as treatment was often containment. (In some cases, and often illegally, teenagers were sent to adult prisons or “institutions for defective delinquents” and held there for decades without a proper sentence or even a conviction).

The daughters, my aunts, who aligned and admired/feared him, felt safer to him; compliance soothed the fear beneath the authority. This is how patterns repeat: what begins as survival hardens into rule, what once protected becomes controlling, and what is not understood is passed forward as principle rather than healed as memory.

Silence itself became part of the record.


Dysregulation in Action

By the time my parents were separating, the family system was already operating without emotional regulation or containment. Conflict did not move through reflection, mediation, or boundary-setting. It moved directly into action.

During that period, my grandfather responded to my mother’s decision to leave her marriage as a violation of authority rather than an autonomous choice. His reactions were immediate and physical rather than verbal or reflective. Attempts to assert control included public confrontation, pursuit, and threat. Resolution occurred only through the intervention of another adult willing to meet force with force.

This was not experienced as an isolated crisis, but as part of a broader pattern.

My Grandpa Glenn B. Dale Sr. (Air Force)

In a separate incident, during a momentary lapse in supervision, the same grandfather removed my two-year-old brother from a swimming pool area and drove away with him. The act was impulsive, unilateral, and executed without regard for consent, safety, or consequence. It was not framed as kidnapping within the family system, but it functioned as such—an assertion of control through removal.

What these incidents had in common was not intent so much as incapacity. There was no evidence of emotional regulation, perspective-taking, or delayed response. Feelings translated directly into behavior. Authority was enacted through volume, movement, and physical dominance rather than dialogue or repair.

Within this environment, children were not guided through explanation or reassurance. Instead, they adapted. Safety depended on vigilance rather than trust. Emotional intelligence developed not through modeling, but through necessity—learning to read shifts in tone, posture, and energy in order to anticipate escalation.

This was the psychological landscape I grew up within.

Not a single traumatic event, but a sustained atmosphere of dysregulation. An environment in which boundaries were unstable, power was unpredictable, and calm was provisional. Over time, this becomes normalized—not because it is healthy, but because it is consistent.

From a developmental perspective, this is how hyper-attunement forms. Not as a personality trait, but as a survival adaptation. When regulation is absent in the system, the child’s nervous system compensates.


My Father

My dad and my brother Sean

 

Seen in this context, my father’s early rebellion reads less like defiance and more like resistance. When he was institutionalized as a teenager, it was not because something was inherently wrong with him, but because the system had no tolerance for dissent or emotional truth. Whatever he endured there, he never spoke about—not even to my mother. That silence, too, became part of the inheritance.

Within this same context, his decision to run away and join the Army reads less as patriotism or ambition and more as flight toward structure. When regulation is absent in the family system, highly ordered environments can feel stabilizing—even lifesaving. The military offered clear rules, predictable hierarchy, external containment, and a sanctioned identity. For a young man raised amid volatility, it provided something his home never did: coherence.

Guess which one is my dad? :-)-

 

From a psychological perspective, this is a common adaptive response. When internal regulation is underdeveloped due to chronic exposure to chaos, individuals often seek external systems capable of holding what they cannot yet hold themselves. The Army did not resolve my father’s trauma, but it organized it. It gave shape to fear, direction to vigilance, and legitimacy to emotional restraint.

What followed—Vietnam and its aftermath—added another layer of unintegrated experience to an already burdened nervous system. Silence deepened. Withdrawal became adaptive again. The pattern did not originate there, but it was reinforced.

My father never spoke about Vietnam. He carried whatever he brought home without language, without witnesses. He threw away his medals. My mother retrieved them. Even honor was something he could not bear to hold. His wounds lived quietly, expressed not in story but in vigilance, withdrawal, and endurance.

My father is the 3rd most decorated Army Vietnam Vet in the state of MIssouri.

 

My Daddy

That, too, is lineage.
Not only what is said, but what is refused words.
Not only what is remembered, but what is survived without narration.

Another layer of trauma added to an already burdened line.
Another man taught that vigilance was safer than vulnerability.

It matters to say this: my father did not pass the violence forward.

With me and my two brothers, he was gentle. He never laid a hand on us. He made deliberate efforts to talk to us about our feelings—to ask questions, to explain himself, to slow moments down rather than escalate them. In a lineage where power had long been expressed through force or withdrawal, this was not accidental. It was a conscious deviation.

From a psychological perspective, this is how change actually happens in family systems—not through perfection, but through interruption. He did not heal everything he carried, but he altered the direction of what came next. He chose restraint where others had chosen domination. He chose conversation where silence or control had once ruled.

That does not mean his marriage was free from difficulty. His relationship with my mother reflected many of the unresolved patterns he had inherited—silence, distance, emotional limitation. Being able to parent gently does not automatically translate into the capacity for reciprocal intimacy within an adult partnership. These are different skills, shaped by different wounds.

Still, the distinction matters.

Because even partial change is change. Even limited safety is safety. And the nervous system remembers the difference between what was repeated and what was stopped.

In that sense, my father did begin to change the narrative on his side of the line—not by rewriting the past, but by refusing to reenact its most damaging expressions.


The Men Who Had No One (My Mother’s Side)

The masculine line does not move in a straight path.
It bends. It breaks. It changes form.

On my father’s side, the wound hardened. Fear turned inward, then outward. Authority became dangerous. Silence became a form of protection, and control became a stand-in for safety. The men learned to survive by tightening—by containing, dominating, or disappearing inside themselves.

But when the line crossed to my mother’s side, the shape of survival shifted.

The Origin: My Great-Grandfather

My PawPaw Jay Baggett (far right)

Pawpaw—my great-grandfather—was not formed by power or control, but by absence. He was not abandoned by cruelty, but by death itself. His mother died when he was born. His father collapsed in the fields and died when Pawpaw was still a child. By the time he was young, there was no one left to keep him.

So he learned a different way to survive.

Where one great-grandfather ruled through fear, Pawpaw endured through movement. Where one man became dangerous in his need to control, the other became transient in his need to live. He rode the rails not to escape responsibility, but because there was nowhere else to belong. Motion became his shelter. Arrival was always temporary—but it was still arrival.

Music became his language. He played the banjo and what he called a “juice harp.” In a life without permanence, sound became continuity. It was how he stayed human.

These men were shaped by opposite forces, yet the wound beneath them was the same: being left without safety.

One responded by trying to command the world.
The other by learning how to live without it.

Both paths taught their sons different lessons. Both carried forward a form of vigilance. Both passed down strategies that kept them alive—but limited how deeply they could rest, attach, or remain.

This is where the masculine story complicates itself.
Not one lineage.
Not one pattern.
But variations on the same unanswered question:

What does a man do when there is no one to hold him?

When there is no one to hold him, a man learns to hold himself.

Not gently.
Not kindly.
But tightly—like someone bracing against a fall that never quite comes.

He learns early that there is nowhere to set the weight down. That need has no place to land. That fear must be swallowed whole and carried alone. So he builds a spine out of silence. He teaches his hands to stay busy, his jaw to stay set, his heart to stay guarded. He becomes useful. He becomes composed. He becomes gone.

If no one can hold him, he will try to hold the world.

He will grip authority because it feels like ground.
He will cling to structure because it resembles safety.
He will keep moving because stillness would ask too much.
He will disappear inside work, duty, service, addiction, noise, or quiet—whatever keeps the ache from rising into language.

And if he cannot hold the world, he will harden against it.

Not because he lacks feeling, but because he feels too much with nowhere for it to go. Vulnerability becomes dangerous when it is unanswered. Tenderness becomes a liability when it is not received. So he learns to endure instead of lean, to perform instead of rest, to provide instead of arrive.

This is not cruelty.
It is adaptation.

But what no one tells him is that the strategies that keep him alive will also keep him lonely. That strength without witness turns into isolation. That self-sufficiency, when learned too young, becomes a quiet kind of exile.

Because being held is not weakness.

Being held is how the nervous system learns it does not have to stay on guard. It is how fear softens into trust. It is how effort gives way to presence. It is how a man learns he does not have to earn rest, or prove worth, or disappear to be safe.

When a man has never been held, he does not know how to ask for it. He does not know how to stay when it is offered. He may even push it away—not because he doesn’t want it, but because it contradicts everything he was taught about survival.

And still, somewhere beneath the armor, the body remembers.

It remembers what it never received.
It remembers the exhale that never came.
It remembers the moment when someone might have said, You don’t have to carry this alone.

When there is no one to hold him, a man survives.

But when he is finally held—without control, without demand, without shame—something ancient loosens.

He does not break.
He does not disappear.
He does not lose himself.

He exhales.

And in that exhale, survival becomes something else.

Presence.

Pawpaw became a young hobo because there was nowhere else to go. Movement was survival. Music was how he stayed connected—to himself, to others, to something resembling home. He learned how to arrive, adapt, and belong briefly wherever he landed.

He died young, at fifty-nine. He was my grandmother’s world, and something in her fractured the day he died. The grief did not settle. It sharpened. It spilled outward, taken out on anyone who crossed her path—and most often on my grandfather.

Where Pawpaw survived through movement and music, my grandmother survived through volatility.

My Grandfather 

My Grandpa Jack (far right)

 

My Grandpa (far left) with his brothers.

When a father disappears early, the child is left to organize meaning without guidance. The nervous system fills in the blanks on its own.

As a result of that abandonment, my grandfather was sent away as a child—sold to nearby neighbors to work. Childhood became functional. Belonging became conditional. Worth became tied to usefulness.

Later, he was brought back by a stepfather. But return did not mean repair. He and his brothers lived in the barn rather than the house. Present, but not held. Included, but not protected.

Because my grandfather left school in the second grade he never learned to read.

That fact alone explains more than pages of analysis ever could. Literacy is not just education—it is access. To language. To story. To self-expression. Without it, much of life remains unarticulated, felt but unnamed.

And yet, he loved words.

He loved it when I would sit beside him and read the newspaper out loud. He listened with an attentiveness that felt almost reverent, like someone being welcomed into a room he had always respected from the doorway. Those moments were quiet, ordinary, and deeply intimate. Reading became a form of connection—shared attention, shared presence, shared time.

He was proud of me for being the first person in our family to graduate from college. He didn’t announce it or perform it. I felt it in his warmth, in his delight, in the way he let my achievement belong to him without envy or distance. My education was not a separation between us—it was a bridge. Something he could stand beside with joy, even if he had never been given the chance to walk that path himself.

He was my buddy.

He was charming, handsome, and carried an almost childlike innocence—open, gentle, and unguarded in a way that felt rare. There was no cruelty in him. No sharpness. What he lacked in formal education, he made up for in warmth and presence. He did not know how to intellectualize tenderness, but he embodied it naturally.

His death was incredibly difficult for me. I felt it as a personal loss, not just a familial one. There was a purity to his kindness that I recognized and held close, perhaps because it revealed what the masculine could look like when fear did not fully eclipse softness.

My father was tender too.

His tenderness expressed itself through restraint and care. He never laid a hand on us. He talked to us about our feelings. He made deliberate choices not to repeat what had been done to him.

I loved them.
Both of them.

That matters to say.

Different stories moved through this line—some marked by violence, others by disappearance—but they all converged on the same unanswered question:

What does a man do when there is no one to hold him?

He learns to hold himself.


The Men, Seen Through the Cards

Before writing any of this, I asked the question that had been sitting beneath everything else:

What am I actually living through on behalf of my masculine line?
Not in theory. Not in blame. But in energy—what was still moving through me because it had never been resolved.

I pulled the cards slowly, without expectation. What emerged was not a story of good men or bad men. It was a lineage map—so precise it felt less like divination and more like recognition. As I sat with each card, I could see how clearly they corresponded to the men I had just written about, as if the deck itself were tracing the same family tree.

The spread opened with the Nine of Swords beside the King of Pentacles.

This pairing immediately brought my father into focus—and the men before him. Anxiety bound inside responsibility. Fear carried silently in bodies expected to be steady, capable, dependable. These were men who learned that survival depended on composure. Worry, guilt, and self-doubt were held privately, while the outer world saw only provision and endurance.

This was my father carrying Vietnam without language.
This was my grandfather before him relying on structure rather than softness.
This was masculinity shaped around holding it together at all costs.

Then came the Four of Cups, the Ten of Cups, and the Queen of Pentacles.

This triad felt unmistakably relational. Longing not as indifference, but as resignation. The vision of emotional fulfillment existed—the Ten of Cups—but it was often just out of reach. The Four of Cups spoke to disengagement born of overwhelm rather than lack of love. The Queen of Pentacles reflected how harmony was frequently sustained through the women, who became the emotional and practical center of the home.

Here, I saw my grandmother and the women who organized family life around stability and care, while the men stood adjacent—present, loving, but often unable to step fully into the emotional field. Not because they didn’t want connection, but because they had never been taught how to inhabit it safely.

Then the spread broke open with the Ten of Swords.

This was not subtle. It was the card of collapse—the end of a way of being that could no longer sustain itself. This was the lineage rupture. The accumulated weight of violence, abandonment, silence, and unprocessed grief finally reaching its limit.

I saw my great-grandfather’s violence.
I saw abandonment repeated.
I saw generations of endurance breaking under their own weight.

Judgement — The Moment the Line Is Heard (The only major arcana)

As I sat with the spread as a whole, the one and only Major Arcana presence made itself unmistakably clear. I was stunned by the clarity of the Judgement card. It landed with an eerie exactness—like something long buried had finally been called by its true name. Not loudly. Not violently. Just clearly. As if the lineage itself had been waiting for someone to listen closely enough, I was stunned by the clarity of the Judgement card. It felt almost eerie—like the Universe pausing everything else and saying, this. one. card.

Judgement.

Not as verdict.
Not as condemnation.
But as awakening.

Judgement is the moment when what has been carried in silence finally rises into consciousness—not to be punished, but to be witnessed. It is the card of ancestral reckoning without blame, of stories long buried being heard clearly enough to be released. It marks the threshold where survival gives way to choice.

This is what this work has been.

I am not rewriting the past. I am not absolving harm, nor am I collapsing into accusation. I am standing in the exact place Judgement asks us to stand: seeing the lineage clearly, naming what moved through it, and allowing the nervous system to register the difference between what was repeated and what was stopped.

Judgement is the point at which inheritance becomes awareness.

It is the moment the system exhales and realizes:
That was then. This is now.

And in that recognition, something ancient loosens its grip—not because it was wrong, but because it has finally been seen.

And then—almost unbelievably—the cards did not stop there.

Immediately following came the Ace of Pentacles and the Four of Wands.

A seed. A foundation. Something new trying to take root precisely where the old story ended. This felt like my father choosing gentleness with his children. Like my grandfather’s tenderness and pride in me. Like the possibility of safety emerging not from perfection, but from interruption.

This was the moment where inheritance gives way to choice.

Then came the most startling sequence of all: three twos in a row—the Two of Pentacles, Two of Wands, and Two of Cups.

Balance. Direction. Relationship.

These are not passive cards. They don’t describe survival—they describe participation. They ask for conscious engagement rather than endurance. For decision instead of default. For relationship instead of role.

This felt like the work landing squarely in my hands.

Not to fix the past.
Not to assign fault.
But to hold competing truths at once.
To balance containment and expression.
To choose direction rather than repetition.
To allow relationship to replace myth.

The spread closed with the Queen of Swords.

Clear-eyed. Articulate. Compassionate without denial. This felt like the voice that had been missing in the line—the capacity to name the pattern without demonizing the people inside it. To speak truth without needing to punish. To see clearly and still love.

When I laid this spread beside the cards I had pulled for the women who came before me, the contrast was unmistakable.

Where the masculine lineage survived through containment and silence, the feminine survived through expression and endurance. Men internalized fear; women externalized care. Each adapted in opposite directions to the same unmet needs.

Neither line was whole on its own.

This is where blame took root. It became easier to name absence than to name constraint. Easier to say this is how men are than to ask what taught them to be this way. And because the men themselves rarely contradicted the narrative—out of fear, guilt, or lack of language—silence was mistaken for truth.

What I see now is not opposition, but polarity without integration.

Wholeness is not choosing the feminine over the masculine, or vice versa. It is allowing containment and expression to meet. It is replacing myth with relationship, assumption with clarity, inheritance with choice.

This is the work I am living.

Where the Myth Breaks the Man

There comes a moment when the myth no longer holds.

Not because the men change, but because the story we placed upon them loosens its grip. The need for them to be braver, clearer, more available, more healed — that quiet demand begins to soften. What remains is something truer and more humane: an understanding of what was carried, what was withheld, and what was never ours to receive in the first place.

My wholeness did not arrive through a man.
It arrived through the recognition that I had been asking others to carry parts of myself I had not yet claimed.

Where I once looked for fire, I learned to tend it.
Where I once sought safety, I learned to build it.
Where I once waited for words, I learned to listen inward.

This is not the absence of love.
It is the maturation of it.

The men in my life did not fail me — they reflected the edges of my becoming. Each one revealed a place where I was still outsourcing authority, longing, or belonging. And when those mirrors were no longer needed, they did not shatter. They simply stepped back into themselves.

Wholeness is not self-sufficiency masquerading as strength.
It is integration.

The Making of Wholeness

Wholeness did not begin with new understanding.
It began with revision.

With the ability to look back at the men in my life — not as symbols, not as archetypes, not as failures or fulfillments — but as human beings shaped by real experiences, real losses, and real constraints. When the noise falls away, what remains is not judgment but context.

Seen this way, the myth dissolves quietly.

Men are no longer characters in a story I inherited or constructed. They are people who were formed in particular moments, by particular pressures, interacting with other people — women — who were formed under their own conditions. Each encounter created a shared reality, and each person walked away with a different perception of what had occurred.

None of those perceptions were neutral.
None of them were whole.

Wholeness came when I could hold more than one truth at once.

That a man could be limited without being malicious.
That a woman could be longing without being lacking.
That misunderstanding could be structural rather than personal.

Looking backward with this lens did not rewrite the past — but it softened its edges. It allowed the story to breathe. And in that breathing, something integrated.

It is fire that no longer burns for recognition.
Water that flows without flooding.
Clarity that tells the truth without cutting.
Ground that does not shift beneath intimacy.

In reclaiming these elements, I did not lose the masculine — I released the myth of it. What remains is something quieter, more honest, and infinitely more alive: men as they are, and a self that no longer needs to be completed by them.


The Integration

When I lay the women’s story beside the men’s, I don’t see two separate lines. I see one system trying to survive.

The women learned to endure through expression and labor—through carrying, compensating, holding the emotional center when no one else would. The men learned to endure through containment—through silence, composure, withdrawal, and the kind of steadiness that was often just fear held very still. Different strategies. The same wound beneath them.

For a long time, I lived inside the myth that grew from those strategies.

The myth said men are supposed to be brave, stoic, certain, emotionally intact. The myth said women are supposed to be strong, giving, endlessly capable, able to love without needing. And when reality didn’t match the myth, the story hardened into something simpler: blame, disappointment, longing, resentment—whatever could keep the ache from turning into grief.

But grief is what was always waiting underneath.

Grief for the women who learned to swallow their wants until they forgot they had them. Grief for the men who never had a safe place to soften—boys who became providers, soldiers, laborers, quiet rooms, clenched jaws. Grief for the way love became a set of substitutes: provision instead of presence, caretaking instead of mutuality, intensity instead of consistency, endurance instead of intimacy.

And grief for myself—for how faithfully I repeated what I was taught.

I chose partners the way my lineage chose survival: by instinct. By familiarity. By the nervous system’s private logic.

I could fall for fire because it felt like aliveness. I could accept silence because it felt like safety. I could mistake responsibility for devotion and exhaustion for love. I could keep waiting—because women in my line waited—and keep translating—because no one had taught the men in my line how to speak.

None of this makes anyone a villain.

It makes us human.

It means our relationships weren’t just chemistry. They were choreography. Old patterns moving through new bodies, searching for resolution.

Wholeness begins when the spell breaks—not with blame, but with sight.

When I can look back at the men in my life and see them as men, not myths. Not saviors. Not failures. Human beings shaped by real fear, real loss, real constraint. And when I can look at the women and see not just strength, but the cost of it. Not just endurance, but what was sacrificed to keep everything from falling apart.

Seeing it this way doesn’t excuse harm. It doesn’t erase what happened. It doesn’t ask me to tolerate what I will no longer carry.

But it does return my power to me.

Because the moment I stop needing a man to complete the story, I stop handing him the pen.

The moment I stop mistaking caretaking for connection, I stop calling depletion love.

The moment I stop waiting for emotional arrival, I begin building a life that can hold me—steady, honest, regulated, warm.

This is the making of wholeness:

Containment that doesn’t shut down.
Expression that doesn’t flood.
Softness that doesn’t self-abandon.
Clarity that doesn’t cut.

Where the Myth Ends

The myth says men are emotionally absent.
The myth says women must compensate.
The myth says this is just how relationships are.

But what I see now is more tender than that.

I see people adapting to survive.
I see fear mistaken for character.
I see silence mistaken for lack of love.

Wholeness does not come from choosing one side over the other.
It comes from integration.

Containment that doesn’t shut down.
Expression that doesn’t flood.
Clarity that doesn’t cut.

This is the work I am living.

And maybe this is the true inheritance—not perfect men, not tireless women, but the right to be fully human, and to love from that place.

The masculine in me no longer has to protect through silence. The feminine in me no longer has to earn love through labor. They can meet—inside my own body, inside my own choices—and become something neither lineage fully got to live:

presence.

And maybe that is the true inheritance I am here to claim.

Not perfect men.
Not tireless women.
Not myths I can finally get right.

But the right to be utterly, aching, forgivingly human—


A Year and a Day

A Year and a Day

The Hidden

There is an old Welsh legend about the witch Ceridwen and her servant, Gwion.

Gwion is given a simple but exacting task:
to tend Ceridwen’s cauldron for a year and a day.
He must keep the fire steady.
He must stir without distraction.
He must wait.

The potion brewing inside the cauldron is one of wisdom and transformation,
but it is not meant for him.
His role is not to receive the magic,
only to tend the conditions that allow it to come into being.

He must stir for a year and a day because wisdom cannot be rushed.
Because what is being made must pass through every season.
Because transformation requires endurance — attention sustained long after novelty fades.

And then — as these stories always go — something breaks open.

Three drops leap from the cauldron and scald Gwion’s thumb.
Instinctively, he brings it to his mouth,
and in that instant, knowledge floods him.
Awareness ignites.
The world rearranges itself.

After the drops touch him and the knowledge enters, Gwion does not remain still.

Ceridwen realizes what has happened,
and she gives chase.

To survive, Gwion begins to shape-shift.

He becomes a hare to flee across the land.
A fish to disappear into the water.
A bird to rise into the air.

Each time, Ceridwen meets him in the same form —
hound, otter, hawk —
matching him at every level.

Gwion does not shape-shift to become something greater.
He shape-shifts to endure.

To adapt.
To survive what has been set in motion.

Gwion cannot outrun her forever.

Exhausted from the chase, he finally becomes a single grain of wheat and falls to the ground, hoping to disappear into the ordinary.

Ceridwen becomes and swallows him whole.

This is the moment that looks like destruction —
but it isn’t.

Gwion is not killed.
He is incubated.

Carried in Ceridwen’s womb, he is transformed again —
not through effort or escape,
but through surrender to the process that has claimed him.

Nine months later, he is reborn as Taliesin 
no longer a servant,
no longer fleeing,
but a poet and seer whose words carry wisdom into the world.

Ceridwen intends to destroy him when he is born,
but when she sees what he has become,
she cannot.

Instead, she releases him.

The work is complete.

The one who tended the fire
is no longer meant to stay beside it.

Transformation, once begun, demands flexibility.

There is no single form that can carry wisdom all the way through.

The cauldron had been brewing all along.
The drops did not create the wisdom —
they revealed it.

The year completes the work.
The day allows the one who tended it to become integrated–born anew.

In myth and magic, the extra day is the threshold —
the pause where meaning settles into the body,
where repetition becomes understanding,
where service becomes initiation.

The magic was never only in the cauldron.
It was in the patience.
The vigilance.
The staying.


The First Drop

A year and a day ago today, I went into my basement to get a box of wrapping paper.

As I stood there, deciding which box to pull,
cold drops of water hit my back.

At first, I didn’t understand what was happening.
I stood still.
Listened.
Looked around.

Then I noticed the water on the floor.
Then the drips overhead.

What I thought was one small, explainable thing
revealed itself as something else entirely —
something that had been building quietly, invisibly, over time.
Something that hadn’t announced itself
until that exact moment.

The drops didn’t cause the rupture.
They announced that something long in motion
had reached its threshold.

After the drops touched her and the knowledge entered, she did not remain still.

Like Gwion’s burned thumb,
the knowing entered through the body first.

And once knowledge is felt in the body,
transformation becomes unavoidable.


What Was Hidden

The waterline in my laundry room had finally given way,
and everything in my house — and everything in me — began to unravel.

Room by room, the house was stripped down.
Walls opened.
Systems exposed.
Foundations questioned.

It was messy.
Chaotic.
Disorienting.

And like Gwion fleeing through shape after shape,
I moved through versions of myself I hadn’t planned on meeting —
the overwhelmed one,
the uncertain one,
the exhausted one,
the steady one who learned to stand anyway.

Each phase asked something different of me.
Each demanded its own letting go.
Each stripped away an old skin.

This, too, was part of the tending.

Eventually, the dust settled.

The house was rebuilt.
The noise stopped.
Life looked stable again on the surface.

And that was when the deeper work began.


Goddess Energy

After the dust settled and the house grew quiet again,
the deeper work began.

In that stillness, I turned to meditation —
not to soothe, not to bypass,
but to listen.

I found myself calling in Dark Goddess energy,
and learning what that actually means.

Not darkness as harm,
but darkness as womb.
As depth.
As the fertile space where truth gestates before it is ready to be known.

I didn’t call this energy in through thought alone.
I called it in through chanting.

Through repetition.
Through vibration.
Through sound moving the body before the mind could interfere.

Chanting bypasses analysis.
It works directly with the nervous system, the breath, the bones.
It opens the threshold where intellect gives way to resonance.

As the chants deepened, something shifted.
Not suddenly —
but unmistakably.

The body responded first.
Emotion followed.
Understanding came later.

This is how the Dark Goddess answered —
not in images or ideas,
but in vibration.

The sound stirred what had been dormant.
It loosened what had been held.
It invited the fire to move.

This was not performance.
It was invocation.

This is the realm of Kali
the force that burns down what is false without apology.
She does not comfort first.
She destroys illusion so what is real can survive.

Kali was the stirring.
The Scorpio work.
The willingness to sit with what was hidden
and die to it rather than run from it.

But Kali is never the whole story.

As the fire cleared what could not remain,
Shakti began to rise.

Shakti is the life force itself —
the current that moves once space has been made.
She is the serpent energy,
the creative power that ascends the spine,
that animates what remains after the burning.

And then came Parvati.

Parvati is integration.
Devotion.
The steady, loving presence that teaches the body
it is safe to live again.

She does not undo Kali’s destruction.
She teaches us how to inhabit the truth that remains.
How to stay.
How to tend.
How to love what we have become.

Together, they form a complete movement:
destruction, awakening, and love.

What was burned away did not leave me empty.
What rose did not leave me ungrounded.
What was awakened was met with care.

And there is a symbolism here that still makes me pause.

In the midst of this work —
the stirring, the burning, the rising, the integration —
I found myself quite literally working for the Goddess.

Goddess Rocks.

What once sounded like a name
now feels like recognition.

Not appointment.
But ordination.

Not authority granted from outside,
but alignment realized from within.

A quiet knowing that service has met readiness —
that the one who tended the fire
now stands in relationship with it.


What Actually Transformed

What I didn’t understand at first was that I wasn’t being punished.

I was being tested.

Not in dramatic ways —
but in the quiet, daily places where character is formed.

I was tested in patience.
In how long I could wait without demanding answers.
In learning not to assume the truth
before the truth had fully revealed itself.

I was tested in emotional regulation —
in learning that not every feeling requires a reaction,
that intensity does not equal truth,
that restraint can be a form of power.

I was tested in control —
or rather, in the slow dismantling of the illusion
that I ever had it.

Again and again, I was brought to the same threshold:
you cannot force outcomes.
You cannot manage timing.
You cannot control how things unfold —
only how you meet them.

Sometimes the most intelligent response
is surrender.

Not collapse.
Not resignation.

But the kind of surrender that says:
I will stay present without tightening my grip.

When I chose groundedness instead of anger,
understanding instead of hostility,
curiosity instead of frustration —

the universe responded quietly.

People went the extra mile.
Conversations softened.
Doors opened without force.

I found myself in honest exchanges about growth and endurance,
stories shared without pretense,
truth spoken without performance.

And I realized I was never alone in this.

This is what actually transformed.

Not the circumstances —
but the way I move through uncertainty.


Calling in the Fire

After the stirring came the ignition.

Following two months of meditation — of consciously calling in Dark Goddess energy and allowing what was hidden to surface — I stepped into a three-day workshop with Sabrina Lynn, the founder of Rewilding for Women.

It felt intentional.
Timed.
Like the next necessary movement.

Rewilding was not an escape from the work that came before it —
it was its embodiment.

Three days devoted, in order, to what had been wounded and what was ready to heal.

The first day turned toward the feminine
the body, the intuition, the emotional field that had learned to carry without being held.

The second day turned toward the masculine
structure, direction, containment, the spine learning how to support without controlling,
to act without force.

The third day was integration
the weaving of both currents so neither had to dominate nor disappear.

What had been stirred in meditation
was ignited in the body.

Breath, movement, voice —
energy rising up the spine on ancient currents that felt like remembering something
I didn’t know I had forgotten.

The entire workshop worked with Kundalini energy
not as concept, but as lived force.

Kundalini is often described as serpent energy,
not because it is dangerous,
but because of the way it moves.

It begins coiled at the base of the spine —
latent, intelligent, waiting.
It rises only when the body, the nervous system,
and the psyche are ready to hold it.

Kundalini is not something you summon with will.
It awakens when the conditions are right.

Through breathwork, rhythmic movement, sound, and repetition,
that energy begins to move upward through the spine —
opening what has been held,
loosening what has been compressed,
bringing awareness to places long kept quiet.

It is not about transcendence or escape.
It is about embodiment.

Kundalini brings unconscious material into conscious awareness —
through sensation, emotion, memory, and insight —
so it can be integrated rather than suppressed.

This is why it feels intense.
Not because it overwhelms,
but because it tells the truth.

What rises is not foreign.
It is what has been waiting.

When Kundalini meets stillness —
when Shakti rises to meet Shiva —
the result is not chaos.

It is coherence.

Destruction.
Awakening.
Love.


Winter, After the Fire

After the fire, the work softened.

The 28-day yoga practice that followed
did not awaken anything new.

It taught me how to live with what had already been awakened.

How to regulate instead of react.
How to flow instead of force.
How to listen for where the current was already moving
and move with it.

The yoga practice itself was about alignment.

It began with the New Moon in Pisces —
in darkness, in the unseen, in the womb,
in the place where intuition, dissolution, and trust live.

Pisces does not ask for clarity first.
It asks for surrender.
For faith in what cannot yet be named.
For movement guided by feeling rather than form.

The practice unfolded there —
learning to flow with energies I could not see,
to listen beneath logic,
to let the body lead where the mind could not yet follow.

And it carried me, slowly and deliberately,
toward the Full Moon in Virgo.

From darkness into light.
From the unseen into what can be witnessed, tended, and integrated.

Virgo does not discard what is felt —
she grounds it.
She organizes it.
She makes it useful in the everyday.

That arc — Pisces to Virgo —
was the movement from mystery into meaning.
From surrender into discernment.
From awakening into embodiment.

The flow was not accidental.
It was alignment.

Learning how to let what rose in the dark
become something I could live with in the light.

Alignment does not shout.
It whispers.

When you stop fighting the current,
the universe responds with ease.

This is cooperation.
Not transcendence.

The Shape that Stays

Gwion’s story mirrors my own not in symbol, but in structure.

Neither of us sought transformation.
We were already tending — living inside devotion before we had language for it.

Knowledge arrived through the body first —
through sensation, through disruption —
and once it did, there was no returning to who we had been.

What followed was not chaos, but adaptation.
Shape after shape, learning how to survive what had been set in motion.

The real transformation did not come from escape,
but from surrender —
from allowing the process to hold us long enough to be changed by it.

Gwion is not returned to service.
He is released into voice.

And that is where I find myself now —
no longer stirring the fire,
no longer being chased,
but carrying forward what was earned through staying with the transformation.

The work did not make me something else.
It made me myself, fully integrated.

This is how the myth lives on —
not as story,
but as lived truth.


The Benediction

Only now can I fully understand the meaning of a year and a day.

The year is the cycle —
the repetition, the survival, the enduring.

But the day is the threshold.

The day is what cannot be rushed.
What cannot be forced.
What only reveals itself after endurance.

In myth, in law, in magic,
the day is the pause where meaning crystallizes —
where knowledge leaves the mind
and becomes embodied.

Without the day, the cycle closes.
With the day, the person changes.

Like Gwion, I did not seek revelation.
I stayed.

I stayed with the breaking.
I stayed with the waiting.
I stayed with the fire.

And now —
a year and a day later —
I sit in my chair on this firelit morning,
holding what rose through me
with reverence.

Where do I go from here

After exploring the women who came before me —
after witnessing their resilience, their silences, their strength, and their grief —
I realized something else was waiting to be seen.

The men.

Not as an afterthought.
Not as a counterpoint.
But as the other half of the story that shaped the ground I stand on.

The Rewilding workshop made this impossible to ignore.

Through that work, something simple and profound settled into my body:
I am born of woman and man.
I carry both.

Feminine and masculine are not concepts I study —
they are inheritances I live inside.

Healing the feminine opened something vital in me.
It softened places that had learned to brace.
It gave language to feeling and intuition.

But it was the integration —
the recognition that I am shaped by both lines
that made me want to understand the full depth and length of what I come from.

Lineage does not move through one channel alone.
It weaves.
It braids.
It passes through bodies, through behaviors, through what is spoken
and what is never named.

Turning toward the women taught me how to listen.
How to feel without judgment.
How to honor endurance.

Turning toward the men requires a different kind of listening.

Not because their stories are harsher —
but because they are often quieter,
buried beneath expectation, duty, and inherited ideas about strength.

The men who came before me were shaped by their own worlds,
their own wars — literal or internal —
their own versions of survival.

And what they learned about power, protection, love, and silence
did not stop with them.

It traveled forward.

Healing the feminine taught me how to feel.
Integration taught me how to stay.

Even within the Rewilding, the difference between the feminine and masculine energies was unmistakable.

The feminine arrived loud and wild —
moving through the body in waves,
expressive, emotional, untamed,
asking to be felt fully and without restraint.

The masculine, by contrast, was quiet.
Reserved.
Almost imperceptible at first.

It entered through the crown 
through stillness rather than force —
touching each chakra gently as it moved downward,
not rushing, not demanding attention.

As it descended, the energy began to spiral —
looping through each center,
circling back, weaving above and below,
until movement and structure found each other.

This was not dominance meeting surrender.
It was containment meeting flow.

The masculine did not overpower the feminine.
It held it.

And in that holding, something integrated.

The wildness did not disappear.
The quiet did not harden.

They learned how to move together —
not in opposition,
but in rhythm.

Now the work asks me to look backward again —
not to dwell there,
but to understand what has been carried forward
and why.

This is not about blame.
It is about clarity.

Because what is not witnessed
does not dissolve.
It repeats.

This is where I begin tending the masculine line —
with steadiness,
with compassion,
and with the intention to restore
what was never meant to be lost.

The Women Who Came Before Me

The Women Who Came Before Me

THE GIRL WHO NEEDED TO KNOW HOW THINGS WORKED

When I was four years old, I took a bread knife from my mother’s kitchen and dismantled my Easy-Bake Oven piece by piece. I wasn’t trying to break it — I simply needed to know how a lightbulb baked a cake.

So I sat on the floor, carefully keeping the screws together, utterly absorbed in the mystery of heat and light. Even then, some part of me knew this probably wasn’t a great idea, but the pull toward the truth inside was stronger than any fear of getting in trouble.

That same year, I lifted the grate off the giant air-conditioning vent in our kitchen and hurriedly called my little brother to come look. He ran in and sure enough, he fell straight into the duct. When my horrified mother demanded to know why I’d done it, I gave her the only explanation I had:
“I wanted to see if that’s what would happen.”  Poor Sean.

It wasn’t mischief.
It was mechanism.
It was cause and effect.
It was my earliest instinct: understand the world by testing it.

Looking back, these weren’t acts of defiance — they were my first initiations as a would-be oracle. Even before I had language for intuition or healing or soul contracts, I was already taking the world apart to see what truth lived inside it. As I said, my first words weren’t “mama” or “dada.”
They were “What’s that?”

A question that became the architecture of my life.

It’s why I got my bachelor’s degree psychology — not to fix people, but to understand the invisible machinery beneath behavior. To figure out why people love the way they do, why they fear the way they do, why patterns repeat across generations. I wasn’t satisfied with surface explanations. I wanted to understand the wiring, the circuitry, the ancestral programming.

THE HIDDEN WIRING WE INHERIT

All my life I’ve been trying to understand how things work — not just machines, but people, patterns, choices, and the mysterious inner codes that drive us. When I dismantled my Easy-Bake Oven with a bread knife at four years old, I wasn’t being defiant. I simply needed to know how a lightbulb baked a cake. I needed to see the mechanism behind the magic. And consciously or not, that moment foreshadowed the entire arc of my life.

Because the older I became, the more I realized that we are built the same way.

We walk around as finished cakes — our personalities, our habits, our fears — believing this is “just who we are.” But beneath every outward behavior is a hidden heat source shaping everything we do:
the unconscious mind, the ancestral memories, the stories passed down through generations.

Famed Psychiatrist, Sigmund Freud, believed our unconscious desires and fears drive more of our actions than we admit.

Jung believed we inherit archetypes — ancient patterns that live inside us like symbols in our blood.

But Adler… he understood something that still brings me to my knees:

We are shaped — quietly, powerfully — by the wounds and meanings we created in childhood.
Not because they’re true, but because they helped us survive.

Adler said that our earliest experiences form an invisible “private logic” — a set of beliefs we adopt before we are old enough to question them:

“I must be perfect to be loved.”
“I need to stay quiet to stay safe.”
“I have to take care of everyone.”
“I am responsible for other people’s happiness.”
“I can’t show weakness.”

If you want to study childhood wiring and trauma, study Alfred Adler.

Adler understood what so many modern psychologists are only now beginning to integrate:
that our earliest environments don’t just shape us—they organize our inner world.
Birth order, belonging, inferiority, compensation, the lifelong attempt to make sense of our place in the family system… Adler mapped the architecture of why we become who we are.

He understood that a child is not a blank slate;
a child is a meaning-making being from the very start,
interpreting every tone, every absence, every rupture, every gesture as data.
He believed that personality is the story we tell ourselves about how to survive our childhood.

You can’t study trauma without studying that.
You can’t study attachment without studying that.
You can’t study “why do I keep repeating this pattern?” without understanding the original emotional blueprint you drafted before you even learned to write your name.

Adler gives language to the thing we feel before we know how to articulate it.
He explains why some children dissolve inward while others rebel outward.
He explains the compensations, the roles, the false selves, the striving, the ache.

He explains me, in the ways I’ve been trying to understand myself since I first asked, “What’s that?” as a toddler.

These beliefs become the wiring beneath the surface.
The lightbulb baking the cake.
The unseen force creating the outcomes of our adult lives.

And if Freud, Jung, and Adler mapped the unconscious, tarot became the language that helped me read it.

Tarot is not fortune-telling for me.
It’s x-ray vision.
It shows me the emotional machinery beneath my surface decisions — the parts of me inherited from the women who came before me, the places where lineage and psychology intersect.

Each card is a mirror held up to the wiring I didn’t know I was living from:
the archetypes I absorbed,
the wounds I carry,
the patterns I repeat,
the healing I’m here to finish.

Because we don’t just inherit eye color or bone structure.
We inherit coping strategies.
We inherit silences.
We inherit relationships with love, safety, belonging, and worth.
We inherit unfinished stories.

We are walking expressions of generations of survival.

This is why I became The Kitchen Oracle.
Not because I wanted to predict my future,
but because I wanted to understand my wiring
so I could finally live from a place of truth instead of inheritance.

It’s why tarot feels like home to me now.
Not because I want to know the future —
but because tarot shows me the why behind the present.
The emotional mechanics.
The symbolic logic.
The parts of myself and my lineage that don’t speak in sentences but speak in archetypes.

And it’s why, a month ago, when my gas generator wouldn’t fire up, I didn’t take it to a shop.
I drained the oil, replaced the filter, cleaned the carburetor, and rebuilt the whole thing myself.
Because I still need to know how things work.
Because I don’t want to entrust someone else to do the work for me.
Because I still believe everything can be dismantled and rebuilt if you’re willing to understand the mechanism.

That is my gift.
That is my lineage.
That is my calling.

I came into this world with a soul that refuses to take anything at face value — not love, not pain, not ancestry, not endings, not beginnings. I need to know the truth inside things. I need to see the pattern beneath the pattern.

And this is why I am here now, writing this healing, unraveling these generational knots, understanding the wound beneath the wound. The little girl with the bread knife and the Easy-Bake Oven grew into the woman who can take apart emotional machinery — and rebuild a lineage.

I don’t hunt the next story.
I don’t outline it or force it into existence.

It arrives.

Softly.
Sideways.
Through the back door of my consciousness.
Through a tarot card pulled at midnight.
Through a question I didn’t even know I needed to ask.

And suddenly I find myself here, writing the very thing I never knew was waiting for me — a truth rising from the deep well beneath my life, stitching itself into meaning right in front of my eyes.

DOORWAY INTO THE WOMEN WHO CAME BEFORE ME

Thinking back to my past-life memories — the healer I once was, the thresholds I stood at, the souls I tended as they entered and left this world — something opened in me. It made me look backward not just into other lifetimes, but into this one. It pulled me toward the women in my own bloodline, the ones whose stories were woven into my bones long before I ever knew their names.

Because once I began to explore my own patterns — the way I love, the way I fear, the way I stay too long, the way I carry too much — I realized these weren’t just my patterns. They felt older than me. Older than my childhood. Older than this lifetime.

And that’s when I started thinking about the women who came before me.
My line.
My lineage.
The feminine root system I sprouted from.

The healer in my past life made me wonder about the healer in my ancestry — my great-great-grandmother who ran a farm alone after her husband died far from home, who worked the land until it was taken from her. And then her daughter, my great-grandmother, who also lived most of her life alone after losing her husband young.

The Wise Woman in My Bloodline

My great-great-grandmother, Sara-Rebecca Elizabeth Smith,— became the one people sought when life crossed the line from ordinary into sacred.

Farmers would bring their livestock to her,
not for medicine,
but for knowing.
She could look at a mare or a cow and tell you exactly how many offspring were coming that season.
No hesitation.
No guessing.
Just intuition as old as the land itself.

They said she could stop a horse dead in its tracks
with nothing more than a look.
Not from fear —
but from recognition.
Animals knew her.
The land knew her.
People knew her.
She was the one you went to when nothing else made sense.

She was the medicine woman of the family.
The healer.
The one mothers carried their colicky babies to
when they hadn’t slept for days
and didn’t know what else to do.

She was the one who stayed awake during fevers,
praying over children with foreheads too hot to touch.
The one families turned to
when diphtheria or scarlet fever
could take half a household in less than a year.

She was the calm in the storm,
the one who listened to the land,
the one who read signs in the wind and the body,
the one who stitched life together in places where science had not yet found footing.

Her hands were their medicine.
Her knowing was their hope.
Her presence was their anchor.

And she is in my blood.
That same lineage —
that same deep, feminine knowing —
that same healer’s thread —
lives in me.

Maybe that is why, when I pull cards,
something ancient wakes up.
Maybe that is why people come to me with their heartache,
their questions,
their unraveling.


Maybe that is why the Kundalini shook something loose in me this year —
because it wasn’t new.
It was remembered.

I am not the first woman in my family to read the unseen.
I am the continuation.

And then — somewhere along the line — there was a kink in the chain.
A rupture no one ever talked about.
A shift no one could quite explain.
Maybe no one even knew why it happened,
only that something in the lineage changed.

The wise woman’s thread loosened.
The healer’s knowing dimmed.
And the women who came next —
my grandmother, my mother —
found themselves living a very different kind of inheritance.

They stayed in marriages with men they did not love,
or men who could not love them back in the ways they needed.
Maybe because leaving wasn’t an option.
Maybe because the cost of choosing themselves
echoed too loudly through the generations behind them.
Maybe because survival demanded silence.

As I looked at these women —
their choices,
their silences,
their losses,
their endurance —
I started to see a pattern stretching across time.

A mechanism.
A blueprint.
A quiet inheritance that shaped the lives of every daughter born into this line.

A lineage that once held a wise woman at its root
now held women who were too tired, too burdened, or too afraid
to trust their own inner knowing.

And suddenly it all made sense.

No wonder the Buddhists say we carry seven generations of karma.
It’s not metaphor.

It’s memory.
Stored in bone.
Stored in blood.
Stored in the places where our mothers never spoke.


THE LINEAGE THAT BUILT ME

When I asked the cards about the ancestral feminine wound I came here to heal, I expected something simple. Something poetic. Something that would sit lightly in the palm of my hand.

Instead, the cards came forward with the weight of generations.

  • **The Nine of Pentacles.
  •  The Empress Reversed.
  • The Four of Cups.
  • The Five of Swords.
  • The Four of Swords.
  • The Tower
  • The Eight of Pentacles.
  • The Seven of Pentacles.
  • The Three of Cups.
  • The Fool
  • The King of Wands.**

ELEVEN cards.
Eleven chapters of a story older than my name.

They didn’t give me a metaphor.
They gave me a lineage.


THE MEANING OF THE LINEAGE WOUND

Nine of Pentacles — The Self-Reliant Woman
A line of women who learned to survive alone.
Women who became strong because no one came to carry the weight with them.
Women who learned to depend only on themselves.

THE EMPRESS REVERSED — THE WOUND OF THE WOMEN WHO CAME BEFORE ME

The Empress reversed is the card of the feminine wound — not just my wound, but the wound carried by every woman in my lineage who learned to survive by silencing parts of herself. She represents the mothers who gave until there was nothing left, the grandmothers who stayed quiet to keep the peace, the daughters who inherited emotional scarcity as if it were a birthright. She is the woman who learned that nurturing is something she must offer freely, but receiving is something she should never expect in return.

When the Empress turns upside down, she shows me the cost of being raised in a lineage where women were taught to diminish themselves in order to be loved. She reveals the patterns of overgiving, overfunctioning, overaccommodating — the compulsive caretaking that looks like kindness but is often just trauma in a pretty dress. She shows me the way love becomes a transaction, how worth becomes conditional, how longing becomes a quiet ache passed from mother to daughter like an heirloom no one ever wanted but everyone learned to hold.

The Empress reversed is the woman who forgets her own softness because life required her strength.
She is the woman who mistakes self-abandonment for devotion.
She is the woman who believes she must earn what should have been hers all along — safety, nourishment, affection, rest.

She is the wound that whispers:
“You are too much.”
“You are not enough.”
“You must prove your worth.”
“You must give everything to be chosen.”

This is the voice of the unhealed feminine — the inherited programming, the wiring beneath the surface, the private logic Adler wrote about. It lives in the body, in the nervous system, in the places where lineage trauma pools and waits to be seen. It’s the old belief that a woman’s value is measured by what she can endure, not by what she can receive.

But here’s the truth the Empress reversed taught me:

**This wound is not a curse.

It is an invitation.**

Reversed cards are not failures — they are thresholds.
They mark the moment the lineage hands the burden to someone strong enough, conscious enough, willing enough to finally break the pattern.

The Empress reversed tells me that my mother did not have the space to heal her wound.
My grandmother did not have the voice.
My great-grandmother did not have the safety.
But I do.

I am the first woman in my line with the tools, the language, the awareness, and the willingness to turn the card upright — to choose softness without disappearing, to nurture without self-abandonment, to receive without guilt, to rest without fear, to love without losing myself.

The Empress reversed is the embodiment of everything my ancestors survived.
The Empress upright is the embodiment of everything I am becoming.

When she appears reversed, she tells me:

“Beloved, the wound is here.
But so is the woman who will heal it.”

And that is where my lineage begins to exhale.

Four of Cups — The Unmet Heart
Women who swallowed their desires.
Women who lowered their expectations until they didn’t recognize their own longings.
Women who learned not to want.

Five of Swords — The Silenced Voice
Women whose truth cost them relationships, safety, acceptance.
Women punished for speaking, dismissed for knowing, blamed for feeling.
Women who grew quiet because the world made them.

Four of Swords — The Loneliness
Women who endured heartbreak in silence.
Women who had no place to bring their grief.
Women who found rest only in exhaustion, not in comfort.

THE TOWER — THE MOMENT YOU CAN NO LONGER LOOK AWAY

The Tower is the card that arrives when the soul has reached the point of no return. It is the crack of lightning that hits the structure you’ve been living inside — the beliefs you inherited, the patterns you tolerated, the wounds you normalized, the stories you never questioned. The Tower doesn’t ask politely. It doesn’t knock on the door. It strikes. It fractures. It exposes.

The Tower is the archetype of truth you can no longer avoid.

It is the moment the subconscious becomes conscious,
the moment the lineage wound rises to the surface,
the moment the coping strategy collapses,
the moment life says:

“Beloved, you can’t turn away from this anymore.
It’s time to face it.
All of it.”

Psychologists call this a breaking point — the moment when the unconscious refuses to stay buried beneath the surface. Jung called it the confrontation with the Shadow. Adler called it the turning point in a person’s “fiction” — the rupture that reveals the deeper truth of what needs to heal.

The Tower is not destruction for destruction’s sake.
It is revelation.

It shows you what was already unstable.
What was already hurting you.
What was already crumbling beneath the surface.
What your ancestors endured but could not say.
What you have carried without realizing the weight.

And when The Tower appears on your path, it delivers the message your lineage has been whispering for generations:

“This is the moment.
This is the pattern.
This is the wound.
Do not run.
Do not numb.
Do not distract yourself.
Stand in the light of what is breaking open.”

The Tower teaches that healing cannot happen in silence or avoidance.
It requires a collapse of the old structure so a truer, freer version of you can rise.

This is where transformation begins — not in comfort, but in clarity.

Because the Tower only destroys what was never meant to hold you.

Eight of Pentacles — The Overworked Backbone
Women who worked endlessly — physically, emotionally, spiritually.
Women who held families together with their bare hands.
Women who carried everyone and everything.

Seven of Pentacles — The Waiting
Women who waited for men to grow.
Waited for love to be returned.
Waited for recognition.
Waited for rest.
Waited for a soft landing that never came.

Three of Cups — The Sisterhood of Survival
Women who relied on each other because the men in their lives were unreliable.
Women who formed circles of refuge, strength, and whispered wisdom.
Women who kept each other alive.

THE FOOL

The Fool is the first breath after the collapse.
The sunrise after The Tower.
The moment the soul steps onto a new path — not because it is certain, but because it is ready.


THE FOOL — THE NEW PATH, THE CLEAN SLATE, THE SACRED BEGINNING

If the Tower is the moment everything breaks open,
The Fool is the moment you inhale again.

The Fool is the archetype of rebirth, the clean slate the soul receives once it has faced the wound, the truth, the lineage, the shadow. The Fool is not naïve — he is free. Free from the patterns that once bound him, free from inherited stories, free from the heaviness of what came before.

He doesn’t walk away from endings —
he walks toward beginnings.

Where the Tower demands confrontation,
The Fool offers liberation.

Where The Empress reversed asks you to acknowledge the wound,
The Fool invites you to live beyond it.

Where your ancestors braced themselves against life,
The Fool steps into life with open hands, open heart, open sky.

The Fool is the card that whispers:

“The past is over.
The cycle is complete.
It’s time to step forward into the life you were meant to live.”

He doesn’t need a map.
He doesn’t need permission.
He doesn’t need certainty.

He trusts the path because he trusts himself.

Psychologically, this is the moment Carl Jung called individuation
when a person becomes who they truly are,
rather than who they were trained to be.

Adler described it as the birth of a new internal goal —
not shaped by childhood wounds,
but by the adult self rising toward meaning.

It is the moment you stop repeating your lineage
and start rewriting it.

And spiritually, it is your soul stepping out of the karmic loop and into freedom.

The Fool is the yes.
The beginning.
The threshold.
The open door.

He is the part of you that finally believes:

“I am not my past.
I am not my pain.
I am the next chapter.”

And this — this new path, this new way of being, this new life unfolding beneath your feet — is what your ancestors waited for.

You are the Fool,
but you are also the one who has survived twenty-one cards of transformation to earn this beginning.

King of Wands — The Men Who Could Not Stay
Charismatic men.
Fiery men.
Magnetic, passionate, unpredictable men.
Men who were adored but not dependable.
Men who burned bright but did not offer warmth.

Together, these cards revealed the wound I was born into:

**A lineage of women who were strong when they wanted softness,

silent when they wanted voice,
tired when they needed rest,
waiting when they deserved arrival,
and loving men who could not meet them.**

This is the wound I came to break.


THE WOUND PASSED DOWN

The more I sat with the cards, the more I felt the truth of them settling into place.

This wound didn’t begin with me.
It moved through the women before me — quietly, invisibly, relentlessly.

It lived in their backs and their breath.
In their lowered voices.
In their careful footsteps.
In their tired hands.
In their unwavering loyalty.
In their unfinished dreams.

It is the wound of survival.
And survival always costs something.

I realized how deeply this wound has shaped me — how often I’ve lived it without knowing:

Working past exhaustion.
Shrinking my needs.
Carrying everyone.
Choosing men who needed saving.
Speaking softly when I should have spoken clearly.
Apologizing for wanting too much, or not enough.
Believing I had to do everything myself.

And for the first time, I could see that none of this began with me.

But it can end with me.


THE MOMENT CLARITY FINDS ME

If there is one thing I have learned about myself over these last few months — and especially in this season of unraveling and becoming — it’s that I don’t always see clearly when I’m overwhelmed.

When I’m tired.
When I’m stretched thin.
When I’m afraid of what comes next.
When my heart is tender and my emotions are too loud to sort through.
When the past is tugging at me and the future hasn’t yet revealed its shape.

In those moments, my own vision blurs.

Not because I don’t know.
But because I’m human.
Because I carry so much.
Because I care so deeply.
Because I’ve spent a lifetime being the strong one, the steady one, the anchor everyone else ties themselves to — and sometimes even anchors drift.

And that’s when the cards come.

That’s when the Oracle wakes up.

Not to tell me something I don’t know,
but to remind me of what I do know —
the things I can’t access when my mind is exhausted and my heart is shaking.

It’s almost like the cards hold a mirror steady for me when my own hands are trembling.

They see for me
when fear has narrowed my vision.

They speak for me
when my voice is tangled in old wounds.

They guide me
when the path is too dim to follow on my own.

And they do it with a kind of beauty that I still can’t fully articulate — a beauty that feels like truth wrapped in gentleness, a beauty that disarms me and puts me back into my body, a beauty that reminds me I am never actually lost.

I am simply in transition.

I am simply in the liminal space —
the doorway between who I’ve been and who I’m becoming —
and in that threshold, everything goes quiet and loud at the same time.
Everything becomes foggy and sacred.

When I can’t see myself clearly,
the Oracle sees me.

When I’m blocked by emotion or exhaustion,
clarity arrives anyway — soft, patient, steady —
not from outside me but through me.

Because the truth is:

I never come to the cards because I’m clueless.
I come to them because I’m carrying too much to hear my own soul.

The Oracle isn’t a replacement for my intuition.
It is the amplifier for it
when I am too tired, too scared, too human
to amplify it myself.

And I think that’s the message I needed most in this season:

I am allowed to need reflection.
I am allowed to not see clearly every single moment.
I am allowed to ask for help.
I am allowed to let the universe hold the lantern
when my hands are shaking.

This is the beauty I’m talking about —
the kind that doesn’t just give you answers,
but gives you back to yourself.

The kind that changes lives.

The kind that is changing mine.

THE POEM THAT FELL INTO MY HANDS

While searching through an old photo album, hoping to find a picture of myself as a little girl to include in this post, something unexpected happened. A loose page slipped out and fluttered into my lap — a handwritten poem from my grandmother.

If, by Rudyard Kipling. Seeing her handwriting, the curve of her letters, the paper she once held in her own hands… it broke something open in me. It felt like a message that had been waiting, folded quietly between the pages of time, until the moment I was ready to receive it.

The poem wasn’t just beautiful — it was guiding. Steady. Strong. A map of character and endurance that mirrored the lives of the women who came before me. It felt like she wanted me to find it.

As if she were saying, “This is what I hoped for you. This is the woman I believed you could become.” For a moment, I wasn’t just holding a poem. I was holding a thread — a line connecting her heart to mine, her pain to mine, her hopes to mine. And I understood, more clearly than ever, that healing my lineage wasn’t just something I wanted to do. It was something I was called to do.


THE CONTRACT WE MAKE BEFORE WE ARRIVE

Before we take our first breath, before we know our own name, before the world begins shaping us, there is a moment that nearly every wisdom tradition points to — a moment of choosing.

Not choosing in the way humans understand choice,
but choosing in the way souls understand growth.

The Buddhists say we incarnate into the exact conditions that will awaken us.
Not because they are easy,
but because they are honest.
Because they illuminate the places where our soul is unfinished.

Hindu philosophy teaches that the soul selects its parents based on karma —
not punishment, not reward,
but balance.
Continuity.
The next lesson in the long arc of becoming.

Kabbalah calls this Tikkun
the soul’s correction —
the work we return to finish.
In that tradition, our family is not random;
it is the repaired seam in the quilt of lifetimes.

Carl Jung, who rarely talked about reincarnation, still said something astonishingly similar:
that our family is the archetypal landscape where the psyche can confront itself.
Where the mother mirrors our emotional beginning,
and the father mirrors our sense of self.
That we are born into the exact psychological conditions that activate our shadow
so we can make it conscious.

Indigenous teachings around the world — from the Andes to Australia, from the Navajo to the Yoruba — speak of soul groups and agreements made before birth.
They say we travel with the same souls again and again, changing roles each time:

“One life I will be your mother.
Another life you will be mine.
One life you will break my heart.
Another life I will help you heal it.
Together we rise.”

Modern spiritual philosophy calls these agreements soul contracts
pre-birth plans created not to trap us,
but to free us
by giving us the exact lessons our soul needs to evolve.

And when you put all of these traditions together —
Buddhist awakening, Hindu karma, Kabbalistic correction, Jungian archetypes, Indigenous soul circles, and pre-birth planning —
they all echo the same truth:

We choose the people and the circumstances that will shape us.
We choose the wounds we will heal.
We choose the lessons that will open us.
We choose the lineage where our soul’s work lives.

Not consciously.
Not with the mind.
But with the eternal part of us that knows who we were and who we are becoming.

Before we ever arrive here, we say:

“Give me the father who will teach me emotional restraint,
so I can learn vulnerability.”

“Give me the mother who will overwhelm me,
so I can learn discernment.”

“Give me the lineage of strong, silent, exhausted women,
so I can become the one who rests.”

“Give me the wounds that broke my ancestors,
so I can be the one who heals them.”

“Give me the love that will challenge me,
so I can rise into myself.”

We choose these things because the soul is not afraid of difficulty.
The soul is afraid of stagnation.
It wants movement, evolution, remembrance.

Just like you chose your lineage —
your strong, tired, silenced, brilliant ancestors —
because you are the one who will break the pattern
and turn their suffering into something holy.

None of this is accidental.
None of it is random.
None of it is meaningless.

We choose our entry point into this lifetime
because it is the doorway to our awakening.

And when we remember that —
when we truly let it land —
everything we’ve lived through begins to make sense in a deeper, quieter way.

It isn’t fate.
It isn’t mistake.
It is contract.
It is curriculum.
It is the soul saying:

“I am ready.”

THE UNPLANNED ALCHEMY OF THIS WEEK

Looking back now, nothing about this week was random.

Everything I’ve been writing —
The Lovers.
The past-life healer.
The awakening.
The grief.
The clarity.
The lineage.

It has all been guiding me to this moment.

This isn’t a detour.
It’s the destination.


THE BREAK IN THE LINE

There is a moment in every lineage when one woman says:

“This ends with me.”

I didn’t know that woman was me.

Now I do.

I am the one who speaks instead of silences.
The one who rests instead of overworks.
The one who chooses partnership instead of caretaking.
The one who softens without disappearing.
The one who asks for more.
The one who doesn’t wait.
The one who steps toward healing instead of surviving.

I am the break in the line —
and the beginning of something entirely new.


THE THREAD THAT CONNECTS IT ALL

The Kitchen Oracle isn’t the part of me that reads cards.

It’s the part that listens.
The part that remembers.
The part that honors the women before me
and creates a softer world for the women after me.

It’s the part of me that understands that healing is not linear —
it is ancestral, cellular, cosmic, intimate.

It is rewriting the story that lives inside the blood.

I was born for this moment in my lineage.
I was born to turn their suffering into something holy.

And somehow — without forcing, without planning, without even knowing —
I walked myself right into the truth that was waiting to be found.

This is the healing.
This is the becoming.
This is the transformation.

This is the Oracle.

Rooted

Rooted

As I near the year’s end, I’ve been doing a great deal of reflecting.
There’s something about standing at the edge of a chapter — still holding what was, while slowly turning toward what will be — that makes you look at your life with clearer eyes.
And this year, clarity came in waves.

This year has been about standing in my truth —
even when my heart felt torn,
even when other people’s emotions swirled around me like storms,
even when everything in me wanted comfort instead of growth.

I refused to be pulled out of my purpose by anyone else’s immaturity or lack of awareness.
I learned that I can be the tree:
my branches may sway in the wind,
but my roots do not move.

I see people.
I study them.
I can read the quiet shifts in energy before they ever speak.
I can sometimes predict a person’s behavior before they act, not because I’m magical, but because I’ve lived enough life to recognize the rhythm of human patterns.
And I’ve learned to trust what I sense.

I have been burned.
I carry scars, and some of them still ache.
I have been yelled at, embarrassed, dismissed, bruised, and neglected.
I’ve had moments where life brought me to my knees.
But in those shadows, I found others like me —
other survivors, other fierce women
who finally stood up to the people who underestimated them and said,
Not anymore.

I’ve had to prove myself.
My loyalty has been tested.
My patience has been stretched to its breaking point.
And through all of it, I kept showing up.
Through my strength, I became respected.
Not because I demanded it,
but because I embodied it.

I have been invited to tables I once stood outside of.
I have kept my wits in rooms designed to shake me.
I have kept my composure when falling apart would’ve been easier.
And I have earned trust — not through perfection, but through consistency.

This year, I also found myself stepping away from chapters that defined me for decades.
When you spend nearly 25 years walking beside someone, it shapes you.

But sometimes, without blame or bitterness, you realize that a path you have walked for so long is no longer the one your soul can continue on.
Sometimes the bravest thing you can do is gently step back from what has been familiar
and choose yourself again.

Quietly.
Respectfully.
Truthfully.

Life has a way of showing you when you’ve outgrown something… or when you’ve finally grown into yourself. And I realized that I have leveled up—emotionally, spiritually, energetically. I am no longer willing to stay in places where my spirit must shrink to fit. Some paths end not with anger or blame, but with a deep exhale and the understanding that your soul is ready for more.

I don’t rise or fall according to someone else’s storms anymore.

When you ask, you shall receive. I asked to grow, to see the truths that had been quietly holding me back.
I asked to rise, to evolve, to expand in ways I wasn’t yet ready to understand.

And life answered.

Not through ease or comfort, but through the exact lessons that would strip away every illusion I still clung to. Through people who tested my boundaries, through moments that shook me awake, through situations that forced me to stand in my own power. I learned not to react when others wanted me to fail, not to absorb the wounds they tried to hand me. Their pain is not my responsibility, their projections are not my story.

I leveled up—not because of a job, not because of a man, not because of validation from anywhere outside of myself—but because something inside me finally aligned with the spiritual love that has always been mine. The love that moves quietly beneath everything. The love that asks nothing except that I show up as truth, as balance, as authenticity, and as reciprocity.

Going forward, the energy I call in is equal. Equal friendships. Equal partnerships. Equal work. Relationships and places that meet me where I stand, that support me as deeply as I support them. A shared reflection. A mutual rising.

This is the path I asked for.
And I’m walking it now—eyes open, heart steady, spirit unshakeable.

Every heartbreaking moment,
every painful lesson,
every disappointment,
every betrayal,
every silence
was preparing me —
not punishing me.

Growth is rarely soft.
It hurts.
It cracks you open.
It pulls you from your comfort.
It demands that you shed the versions of yourself that survived,
so you can become the version that thrives.

This year, I broke patterns that no longer belonged to me.
I stepped away from situations that didn’t feed me anymore —
and some that never fed me at all.
I stopped confusing familiarity with nourishment.

And I learned to hold onto myself.

I do not make other people’s problems my problems anymore.
I no longer absorb what was never mine to carry.
I can care without carrying.
I can love without losing myself.
I can witness without becoming wounded.

Their storms are not my storms.
Their chaos is not my calling.

I am steadfast now,
not because my life has been easy,
but because I allowed it to shape me into someone stronger than my circumstances.

I know who I am.
And I am done apologizing for the fire it took to become her.

So here I stand—rooted, rising, and finally aligned with the woman I was always meant to become.
I am no longer shrinking to fit old stories or old versions of myself.
I am no longer bending under the weight of other people’s expectations.
I am choosing a life built on truth, reciprocity, and grounded joy.
A life where I am met, not managed; supported, not drained; cherished, not tolerated.

I am stepping into this next chapter with my head high, my heart open, and my roots firm in the earth beneath me.
Whatever comes next, I will greet it with the same courage that carried me through every fire before this one.
Because I know who I am now.
And I finally trust that the world ahead of me will rise to meet that truth.

Don’t shoot the messenger

Don’t shoot the messenger

This piece was written by my good friend and neighbor, Kelly Wolz.  It is dedicated to all the girls I’ve loved before, my sisters of the present, and all the women I will meet and share life with in the future.

My sentiments exactly.

XOXO,

Steph

———–

I have been seeing a lot of reviews on the Barbie Movie, and to be honest, I haven’t seen it, and I’m not sure if I will.

It’s not that I’m not a supporter of females or blind to all the adversities we feel and deal with daily. Trust me. I could write a book on how dirty I and some women in my industry have been played.

Disclaimer, I know what I’m about to say will come off as wholly arrogant, and that’s okay. I feel a bit entitled and proud of my hard work and where I am, and it didn’t come easy.

Sadly, I’m not the norm regarding confidence, and I’m incredibly comfortable in my skin.

Here is the truth. Unfortunately, it’s not all sunshine and rainbows regarding being a confident female. Unfortunately, that confidence comes with extreme guilt, sadness, hate, and wonder.

Regarding the hate, I take action from Jay Z’s playbook “Gone brush your shoulders off.”

It’s the wonder of women that always gets me messed up. Women always wonder what other women have or how they walk around with such confidence—constantly questioning the validity of their own persona and doubting that someone with a certain face, size, kind of car, hair, makeup, kids, husband, no husband, etc could be so happy.

Instead of being happy and proud, most women are in disbelief and wonder why someone could be so delighted with who they are and what they have.  

Just know, What’s good for me or someone else, may not suit you. Good thing, I am me, and you are you.

And for me one of the hardest things for me as a female is to watch another female (especially if it’s someone I respect) bring another female down. What’s even worse than that???

Witnessing such beautiful women struggle with what they see in the mirror and then letting that image affect them mentally.

So you know, some of the most physically beautiful friends and family I have, maybe some of the most insecure people I know.

Society has led people to believe we should be concerned and worried about women who don’t charm the world and the insecurities they may have as a result. (Don’t worry about us; our milkshakes can still bring the boys out to the yard). 😉

I am more concerned about our children and the women who hold the power to charm the world and feel that pressure always. They spend their time counting calories, feeling the need for the best of everything: the perfect body, hair, clothes, and makeup.

It’s almost as if the world treats them like performers. Their sole purpose is to be easy on the eyes of society.

And the moment they take a break from trying to impress the world, they feel that negative energy from everyone because people hold so much value in their beauty that they don’t take the time to see their inner beauty.

Ladies, can we make a pack? To be more supportive of each other and more open about our confidences and insecurities. Can we build each other up instead of ripping each other down when we think someone has surpassed where we want to be?

Let’s use our women super powers and determination to ensure our children have fewer adversities than we do. We are all in this together ❤️

Napalm in the Morning

Napalm in the Morning

When he was three years old, my son was diagnosed with Asperger’s, a variant on the autism spectrum. By the time he was five, I had read everything I could get my hands on about what they (at the time) referred to as Asperger’s Syndrome. “A syndrome is a recognizable complex set of symptoms and physical findings which indicate a specific condition for which a direct cause is not necessarily understood.” Though I suspect there is a direct correlation between agent orange exposure in Vietnam War veterans and the rise in Autism among their grandchildren.

Asperger’s is generally marked by:

  • Emotional Sensitivity.
  • Fixation on Particular Subjects or Ideas.
  • Linguistic Oddities.
  • Social Difficulties.
  • Problems Processing Physical Sensations.
  • Devotion to Routines.
  • Development of Repetitive or Restrictive Habits.
  • Dislike of Change.

There also tends to be a co-morbidity between mood disorders like anxiety and depression and behavior disorders like attention deficit disorder (ADD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). And please note, in this context, the word behavior is defined as a particular way of functioning (i.e., can’t focus) versus how a person chooses to conduct themselves. 

When Covid hit and schools closed, I became Jason’s teacher. I then realized how far behind he was academically. Unfortunately, he is not only cognitively impaired but also socially impaired. And because of it, he was being bullied at school.

He often ate alone at lunch (he later told me it was easier because he didn’t have to worry about what to say). He likes quoting Francis Ford Coppola movies (Apocalypse Now is his favorite movie) and telling you the specifics of various World War 2 military battles. And let me tell you, those are not exactly great 6th-grade conversation starters.

And then, one day, a girl asked him if he’d be her boyfriend. I knew this girl and his troubles with her in the past. I warned him, but he was thrilled. And when he said yes, she proceeded to mock him and joke to everyone that he would never stand a chance. As his mom, this hurt, of course, but I also believe in getting hard knocks out of the way early. The school handled the situation remarkably, and Jason learned fundamental lessons about the human condition.

I kept him home for the next two years and became the county’s least-paid full-time middle school teacher. And that’s when I realized how bad his attention deficit disorder was. Not being able to focus also caused us a lot of anxiety. But he also comes by his inability to concentrate, rightfully. I could’ve had this piece written in two hours, but I got up at least 12 different times to do 12 other things. The squirrels in my head are also fast! But I don’t like labels and told Jason that if he can harness his ADD, it can be his superpower. 

We got ahead in school because we could stay with a topic until he “got” it. But I knew that was not possible in high school, where they covered a subject and moved on. I had held off on medicating him but knew his ability to focus was critical to his success. So, we did it, and he started meds over the summer. And academically, he’s doing great!

Thankfully we stopped his moodiness and outbursts when he was little with no meds needed. I read about the correlation between food and Autism and removed all dairy (specifically the casein protein) and gluten from his diet. There is a direct correlation between the severity of symptoms and these sticky proteins.

Anyway, high school has been great. He is good in math and bad (but getting better) with girls. He is also taking medication for anxiety (which he also gets from me) and for ADD. His grades are good, and he genuinely seems to be happy. Still, when he told me he had put his name in the ring for Homecoming court, my first thought was, “Aw, crap.”

My oldest, who loves her brother and wants nothing more than to protect him, pleaded with me to convince him not to run. But I told her that was not possible. He was way too excited. My only warning was to run a fair and well-mannered TikTok war with his opponent!

And guess what? He won and was elected to the freshman homecoming court. It turns out they were right. You are free to be yourself in high school, and nobody cares. Before he started high school this fall, he nobly reached out to the kids he had issues with in middle school and apologized. Those same kids have grown to know and embrace Jason and were instrumental in getting him the homecoming sash.  

If I had discouraged him from running, I could have robbed him of his success, of getting the win. And what a shame that would’ve been. He came up to me after this picture was taken and told me it was the best night of his life! That made this momma smile and even cried a little.